Survey finds users frequently bullied online

A Pew Research Center study found that a number of web users have experienced harassment. And poll responders say they have seen someone else get harassed online.

John Adkisson/Reuters/File
A man works on his computer during a portrait session in Charlotte, N.C. on December 1, 2011. A Pew Research Center study found that 40 percent of web users have experienced harassment.

Trolls and bullies are the ire of every online user. Harmful messages or threatening posts have become commonplace on social media sites. And though there are some safeguards, online trolling continues. 

A Pew Research Center study found that 40 percent of online users have experienced some form of online harassment. And 73 percent of online users have seen someone else get harassed online. The survey, which interviewed 2,849 web users, provides insight into the web at a time when online harassment is attracting a lot of attention. In recent months, #GamerGate has drawn attention for harassment of female video game developers and critics.

The Pew study takes a holistic look at online harassment in all forms, "from garden-variety name calling to more threatening behavior." Of the 40 percent of people who have experienced harassment, 18 percent have experienced more severe forms, which includes being the target of physical threats, harassment over a sustained period of time, stalking, and sexual harassment. And interestingly, men were more likely to experience online harassment than women. 

Most of the harassment took place on social media sites. Of those who said they experienced harassment online, 66 percent said the most recent incident occurred on a social network. 

"It was striking to see how different varieties of harassment impacted different groups on different platforms, and the range of reactions online harassment elicited," said Maeve Duggan, main author of the Pew report, in a statement.

At the heart of the issue is the an online environment that allows for anonymity. Of all those surveyed, 92 percent said the Internet's environment let them be more critical of others. And that critical environment lends itself to anonymous threats. The study found that 38 percent of harassment victims said a stranger was behind the threats, and 26 percent said they didn't know who was behind the harassment. 

Though online harassment is so common, it is hard for police to patrol online bullies because "our legal system hasn't quite caught up with technology," Elizabeth Dowdell, a nursing professor at Villanova University who studies online aggression, told the Associated Press. 

"People look for outlets for aggression and the Internet is a wonderful place because it's anonymous and you don't have to be truthful," Ms. Dowdell said. "You can have many different (personas) online. So you might think 'I'm going to block Scaryfriend123' and Scaryfriend says 'Fine, I'm going to use my other name Superniceguy' and you just don't know."

After her father's death, Zelda Williams, daughter of famed comedian Robin Williams, left social media because of harassment. “Deleting this (Twitter application) from my devices for a good long time, maybe forever," she wrote on Twitter. Ms. Williams' harassment was so bad Del Harvey, Twitter's vice president of trust and safety, came out against the harassers.

"We will not tolerate abuse of this nature on Twitter," he said in a statement. "We have suspended a number of accounts related to this issue for violating our rules and we are in the process of evaluating how we can further improve our policies to better handle tragic situations like this one."

Because of online harassment, many websites are finding ways to protect users. Facebook began strictly enforcing a policy that users must use their real names in order to protect users, but the policy came under fire because members of the LGBT community, who sometimes use fake profile names to protect themselves, were being kicked off the site. Ello, a trendy new social media site, created tools to allow users to block anyone who is threatening them. In an interview with The Christian Science Monitor, Ello's founder Paul Budntiz said Ello has already removed hundreds of users who harassed other users.

The Pew survey found that 22 percent of people last saw saw someone being harassed in the comment section of a website. News organizations, like The Christian Science Monitor, sometimes choose not to allow commenting, or they only allow users to comment if their account is connected to a Facebook account. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Survey finds users frequently bullied online
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today