Google doodle: Did John Steinbeck spy for the CIA?

Writer John Steinbeck offered to work for the CIA during the cold war. Evidence suggests that the agency accepted. 

Google honored author John Steinbeck Thursday.

Google handed over its homepage Thursday to a short, interactive e-book honoring John Steinbeck. The author wrote several American classics, including "The Grapes of Wrath," "Cannery Row," "Of Mice and Men," "The Pearl," and "Travels With Charley." 

Mr. Steinbeck achieved great fame within his lifetime, winning the Pulitzer Prize and Nobel Prize for Literature. But one of his most interesting actions only became public after his death.

In 2012, the Central Intelligence Agency released documents indicating that Steinbeck had offered to spy for his country. The author planned a tour of Europe in 1952 and asked the agency if it needed anyone on the ground.

At the time, America and the Soviet Union had locked horns in a global cold war. The US needed smart men and women to gain the upper hand, and Gen. Walter Smith, director of the CIA, apparently was eager to recruit the author.

"If during this [trip to Europe] I can be of any service whatever to yourself or to the Agency you direct, I shall be only too glad," Steinbeck wrote to Smith in January 1952. "Again – I shall be pleased to be of service. The pace and method of my junket together with my intention of talking with great numbers of people of all classes may offer peculiar advantages."

The general wrote back just a few days later. "You can, indeed, be of help to us by keeping your eyes and ears open on any political developments in the areas through which you travel, and, in addition, on any other matters which seem to you of significance, particularly those which might be over looked in routine reports," wrote Smith. "It would be helpful, too, if you could come down to Washington for a talk with us before you leave. We might then discuss any special matters on which you may feel that you can assist us."

While we do not know what the two men discussed in Washington, author Brian Kannard believes that Steinbeck worked for the CIA through the 1950s and '60s. Mr. Kannard collected his evidence through Freedom of Information Act requests to the agency, as well as conversations with people close to Steinbeck, such as his son Thomas. 

Steinbeck's youngest son told Kannard about regular trips that he and his father took to Paris in 1954. "Each Thursday, John would take Thomas and his brother to 'get lost in and around Paris,' " Kannard writes in his book "Steinbeck: Citizen Spy." "Thomas now feels that these trips could have been used for John to meet with Agency contacts."

Yes, Steinbeck could use his fame to navigate Europe without raising too many questions, but the author's political views made him a curious choice for a cold war spy. In 1935, Steinbeck joined the League of American Writers, a group linked to Communist efforts. Thomas Steinbeck says the Federal Bureau of Investigation targeted his father. FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover couldn't find any dirt on him, but encouraged the Internal Revenue Service to audit Steinbeck's taxes year after year, according to his son. "Do you suppose you could ask Edgar's boys to stop stepping on my heels?" Steinbeck wrote to US Attorney General Francis Biddle in 1942. "They think I am an enemy alien. It is getting tiresome."

The FBI has denied that Steinbeck was under investigation.

Whatever clandestine actions Steinbeck may have taken, he will be remembered most for his writing. But next time you read the novel "East of Eden" – which came out the same year that Steinbeck planned to meet with the CIA director – think about Steinbeck's potential nonfiction adventures.

For more on how technology intersects daily life, follow Chris on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to