Does the iPad Mini make any sense?

Two years after Steve Jobs dismissed the idea of a tablet with a 7-inch screen, Apple now says that a 7.9 inch tablet is just fine. What prompted Apple's change of heart? 

Apple
One-handed use could be the real 'killer app' of the mini.

"Why would I want it?" is the main question after Apple's announcement today (Oct. 23) of a 7.9-inch iPad mini tablet.

And it's a bigger question than after Apple events over the past few years, where the answer was obvious. Would I want a thinner iPhone with faster wireless? Sure, at least if I'm due for an upgrade from my carrier. How about an iPad with a better screen for the same price? Why not?

But what about a new form factor? Two years after Steve Jobs' statement that a 7-inch screen is "too small to express the software," Apple now says that a screen slightly larger than 7 inches is just fine. Starting at $329, the iPad mini costs two-thirds as much as the full-size iPad, which has a 9.7-inch screen (though people generally call it 10-inch). But it had better be much more than two-thirds as good to be worth even the lower price.

Product user experience expert Don Norman told TechNewsDaily that Steve Jobs' statement was "one of the stupidest quotes of all time, because Apple started with a small tablet. The only thing was that they called it the iPhone."

The co-founder of the Nielsen-Norman Group (and former vice president of Advanced Technology at Apple), Norman sees all tablets and smartphones mainly as devices on which users can enjoy media rather than create it. Assuming the mini would have a 7-inch screen, it would be "just the right size" for reading books as well as watching video, he said, pointing out the popularity of the media-centric, 7-inch Amazon Kindle.

[SEE ALSO: What's the Best E-Reader for You?]

"To read a book on an iPhone is too small, but on [a 10-inch] iPad is too big," said Will Larche, an iOS app developer with personal finance site LearnVest. "The iPad is actually kind of heavy. People tend to use it with two hands or put it on their knee."

Both Norman and Larche said that the ability to hold an iPad mini in one hand would make it a lot more useful in many cases — a key benefit that Apple touted in its introduction of the product today. A smaller tablet is a lot easier to travel with, said Larche, because it fits better on an airplane tray table. Norman even thinks that the iPad mini will be more popular than the full-size one.

[SEE ALSO: Why Amazon Can Take Away Your Digital Downloads]

But if that's the case, why not just get a Kindle? After all, it's cheaper — Kindle's price starts at $199 (and sometimes lower with special offers). Even if a small tablet is mostly used for reading and watching videos, people do want all the other features from time to time. "People do not want to stop what they are doing to go send an email [on a different device]," said Larche. The mini is a full-fledged tablet, able to do everything the 10-inch can.

Larche's one concern was that the mini might never have as many apps. But by giving the mini the same resolution as the first- and second-generation iPad (1024 by 768 pixels), Apple allows the more than 275,000 apps that work on the 10-inch iPad to work on the mini.

Norman questioned whether the exact same apps will be as easy to use on a small screen, however. "It's really convenient — except, yeah. It's a small screen. So you can't do some things," said Norman. "You want to rethink design, too. The smaller devices require much more consideration of target size," he said, referring to the size of a virtual button, for example. So it may not be a matter of just running the same apps and getting the same experience.

But app developers can make it work, he said. People will just pick the tablet size that works best for them — how it fits in their hands, how it fits in a bag while traveling.

"I think the average person will love this because they can choose," said Norman. "And some people will say 'I'll have all of them.'"

Follow Sean Captain on Twitter @seancaptain and TechNewsDaily @TechNewsDaily. We're also on Facebook & Google+.

Copyright 2012 TechNewsDaily, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.