Can Google Glass improve philanthropies? We'll find out soon.

Out of 1,300 nonprofits, Google selected five organizations to receive its Glass technology and grants of $25,000 to aid with their missions.

Ints Kalnins/FILE/REUTERS
Developer Maximiliano Firtman wears the prototype device Google Glass before a news conference ahead of the 2013 RigaComm event in Riga in this file photo taken November 4, 2013.

Google will award five nonprofits with free versions of Glass, the wearable computer technology. 

The gifts will be given by Google.org, the search giant's division designed to aid and support nonprofits. The five nonprofits were selected out of 1,300 nonprofit organizations that submitted applications detailing how they would "use Glass to amplify their impact." In addition to Glass, the nonprofits will each receive grants of $25,000, a trip to Google headquarters, and the chance to work with developers to implement their visions for using Glass with their respective missions. 

The five winning organizations are: 

  • Classroom Champions: The Florida organization uses technology to connect Olympic and Paralympic athletes with students in high-need schools. Using Glass technology, students will get the chance to see what the athletes see as they train, putting students in the visceral shoes of their athlete mentors. 
  • Mark Morris Dance Group: The New York-based dance organization works with people diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. The organization will help them "remember and trigger body movements in their daily live," according to PC Magazine
  • The Hearing and Speech Agency: The Baltimore-based nonprofit will work with Glass to develop new ways for people diagnosed with speech difficulties, hearing loss, or autism to communicate. 
  • Women's Audio Mission: The San Francisco nonprofit will use Glass to develop educational programs for girls with interests in music and science.
  • 3000 Miles to a Cure: The North Carolina nonprofit raises money to research brain cancer.

It's no secret that Google is trying numerous avenues to get its wearable technology to catch on in the mainstream. Recent ventures have included turning to high fashion by partnering with fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg's studio, DVF, and Google hiring Ivy Ross, the former marketing executive who has worked for such high-profile brands as Calvin Klein and Coach. 

Nevertheless, Glass still faces an image problem. Between being mocked by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show and getting banned in UK movie theaters, consumers have not quite yet caught on to the wearable device that currently costs $1,500, which can be reasonably assumed to have played a role in the search giant's decision to use the technology in aiding nonprofits. 

Google is also in the process of expanding Glass's potential in the business world by partnering with companies to innovate new uses for the product through its "Glass for Work" program. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.