April Fools' Day: Google begins search for official Pokémon Master

April Fools' Day kicks off with Google on the hunt for Pokémon. The company says it is accepting applications through April 2. 

There's got to be some Pokémon down there somewhere.

Google has a long, storied (and very colorful) history of April Fools' Day pranks.

There was Gmail Paper, with its "96 percent post-consumer organic soybean sputum," and Project Virgle, with its promise of "the first permanent human colony on Mars." And in 2013, there was the Google Wallet Mobile ATM, a smart little device that "easily attaches to most smartphones and dispenses money instantly and effortlessly." 

In 2014, one of the most high-profile gags involves Pokémon, the massively popular video game franchise. In an impressively high-quality video posted yesterday, Google took the wraps off the Pokémon Challenge – a race to capture a bunch of little monsters from far-flung hideouts around the globe. The winner, Google says, will receive the position of Pokémon Master. 

"It's always been important to us to have the most qualified employees at Google," Google exec Brian McClendon says in the video (with an admirably straight face). "Now using the technology created by the Google Maps team, we've prepared the most rigorous test known to man to find the world's best Pokemon Master." 

And herein the root of the aforementioned hoax. Because although the video promises an augmented-reality, action-packed cliffhanger of a monster hunt – starring you – the real Pokémon Challenge is a mini-game layered on top of the Google Maps interface.

And no, there's no actual Pokémon Master gig. 

Which isn't to say it doesn't look fun. Assuming you've got the latest version of Google Maps on Android or iOS, you can get started here. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.