Microsoft: Ballmer replacement won't be selected until 2014

Microsoft's board is expected to render its decision in early 2014. 

AP
The search for Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's replacement won't conclude until next year, a member of Microsoft's board said today.

Microsoft's hunt for a replacement for outgoing CEO Steve Ballmer isn't over yet. 

In a blog post on Tuesday, John W. Thompson, a member of Microsoft’s board of directors, said that the search committee, which he chairs, won't choose a candidate until next year. Still, he said he was "pleased" with the committee's progress – and said that the search included both outsiders and current Microsoft employees. 

"We identified over 100 possible candidates, talked with several dozen, and then focused our energy intensely on a group of about 20 individuals, all extremely impressive in their own right," Mr. Thompson wrote. "As you would expect, as this group has narrowed, we’ve done deeper research and investigation, including with the full board. We’re moving ahead well, and I expect we’ll complete our work in the early part of 2014." 

Mr. Ballmer announced he was stepping down earlier this year. "There is never a perfect time for this type of transition, but now is the right time," Ballmer said in August. Since then, rumors have swirled about his possible replacement. Some analysts have mentioned Stephen Elop, currently the CEO of Nokia, which Microsoft is in the process of acquiring; others have speculated it could be Ford CEO Alan Mulally. 

In related news, last week, the tech site The Verge reported that Nokia was working on an Android-powered smart phone code-named "Normandy." The device would allegedly replace the Asha line of Nokia phones in some developing markets. Nokia did not comment. But within the Finnish company, "there is a sense that Redmond" – i.e. Microsoft – "may be willing to pursue the project," writes Ina Fried of All Things D. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.