#My2K: Can Facebook and Twitter sway 'fiscal cliff' debate?

President Obama and the White House hope to rally support on social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. 

Reuters
President Barack Obama leaves One More Page bookstore in Arlington, Virginia, on Nov. 24. Obama, in an effort to rally support for his approach to the debt crisis, has taken to Twitter and Facebook for help.

President Obama is turning to Twitter and Facebook to gin up support for his plan to tackle the ballooning national debt. 

At issue is the so-called "fiscal cliff" – the tax hikes and spending cuts that will take effect in early January, unless Congress can reach some sort of deal on the federal budget. Democrats want to end the Bush-era tax cuts for Americans making a quarter million dollars or more, and extend tax cuts for the middle-class.

But Republicans have fought any increase in taxes, choosing to focus instead on cuts to entitlement programs such as Medicare

In a press statement this week, the White House said the "fiscal cliff" would prove disastrous for the American public. 

"If Congress fails to act before the end of the year, every American family’s taxes will automatically go up," the White House press team wrote. "A typical middle-class family of four would see its taxes rise by $2,200 starting in 2013." 

To help hammer home the message, the White House is encouraging supporters to use the "#My2K" hashtag on Twitter and to post testimonials on Facebook. Thus far, hundreds of thousands of messages have piled up. "This should not even be a debate. We need money. The middle class is already suffering. Tax the rich, they can afford it. COMMON SENSE," one user wrote on Twitter. 

It's worth noting, of course, that Obama has tried this strategy before. Back in 2011, when Congress was engaged in a rancorous wrestling match over the debt, Obama encouraged his followers on Twitter to reach out to their local representatives. 

"Tweet at your Republican legislators and urge them to support a bipartisan compromise to the debt crisis," Obama wrote

Unfortunately, the 2011 talks effectively ended in stalemate. 

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.