Apple secures another countrywide ban on Samsung phones

Samsung and Apple, the two most popular smart phone manufacturers in the world, have been butting heads over a series of patents. The latest victory, courtesy of a Dutch court, goes to Apple. 

Reuters
Samsung flags are set up at the main entrance before the IFA consumer electronics fair in Berlin in August. A Dutch court has ordered Samsung to halt the sales of certain mobile devices.

Apple has won the latest battle in its long-simmering war with Samsung. 

On Wednesday, a court in The Netherlands ruled that a scrolling feature used in Samsung's mobile software infringed upon a key Apple patent, and ordered Samsung to halt sales on a range of Galaxy smartphones and tablets.

"The ban only applies to Galaxy products that run Android 2.2.1 and higher that don't use Samsung's proprietary photo gallery software," IDG News reported

The patent in question allows users to flick, pinch, and scroll their way through images saved onto Samsung devices. 

"Samsung is disappointed with the court's ruling," the South Korean company said in a message to the tech site The Inquirer. "Apple has been trying to limit consumer choice and discourage innovation through their excessive and flawed legal arguments. We remain confident that our products are unique, and we will continue to take all available measures to protect consumer choice in the Netherlands."

Samsung had previously won a June court victory against Apple, which was deemed by a Dutch court to have violated a patent related to Internet connectivity. 

"Both these companies need to understand that some cases will be won by Samsung and some by Apple," tech analyst Manoj Menon told the BBC at the time. 

In related news, Samsung recently announced it sold 5 million Samsung Galaxy Note II "phablets" in two months. The Note II is a close cousin of the Samsung Galaxy S III, the device that currently holds the title of the most popular smartphone in the world. 

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.