On eve of Windows 8 launch, adoption numbers are less than stellar

Microsoft will release the Windows 8 operating system later this month. But it may be having trouble ginning up interest in the OS. 

Reuters
The Windows 8 operating system is displayed at the Microsoft booth during the 2012 Computex exhibition in Taipei.

Well, things could be worse for Microsoft and its forthcoming Windows 8 operating system, but they certainly could be a whole lot better. 

According to the analytics firm Net Applications, a mere 0.33 percent of PCs running Windows in September were running a preview or advance version of Windows 8. As Gregg Keizer of Computerworld points out today, that's a far cry from the 1.67 percent of computers running a beta edition of Windows 7 in the run-up to the release of the last Microsoft OS. 

Some caveats: Windows 8 does not officially launch until Oct. 26. Plenty of folks don't bother to download beta versions of an operating system – they'd rather wait for the real thing. (Windows 8 went into Consumer Preview in February.) Still, Preston Gralla, a columnist at Computerworld, argues that while Windows 8 is a "winner" on tablet computers, the PC version of the operating system is underpowered and difficult to navigate.  

"Microsoft is clearly hoping that pre-launch numbers aren't a harbinger of things to come," Gralla writes. "My guess, though, is that they are."

In related news, early last month, Microsoft and Nokia took the wraps off the Lumia 920 and the Lumia 820, a pair of Windows Phone 8-powered smartphones. The Lumia 820, with its less-glitzy camera and display, is a device for budget-minded shoppers; the 920 gets a bigger and better screen and a 8.7-megapixel camera with Nokia PureView advanced optical imaging stabilization.

Downloaded the Windows 8 Consumer Preview? Drop us a line in the comments section. And to receive regular updates on how technology intersects daily life, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.