Bacon number: Google turns the party game into a new Easter egg

This week Google rolled out Bacon number, another fun feature that's sure to turn a lot of otherwise productive afternoons into time sinkholes. If you've ever wanted to automate the party game "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon," Google's got your back.

Google.com
Google now automates the "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon" party game by giving you celebrity Bacon numbers. Here, Google serves up George Foreman's Bacon number, 3, along with some other queries related to Foreman and bacon.

Sure, Google search was useful before -- you could use it to find out the weather, movie times, word definitions, and information on just about any topic. But this week Google introduced a feature that's nothing less than a revolution in search: Bacon number.

Okay, maybe "revolution" isn't quite the word we were looking for.

Google can now automate the "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon" party game, which challenges players to trace any actor back to the "Footloose" star. Tom Hanks, for example, has a Bacon number of 1 (he and Bacon were in "Apollo 13" together). Zoë Saldana has a Bacon number of 2 (she was in "The Losers" with Jason Patric, who was in "Sleepers" with Bacon). And so on. To try the feature, just type "Bacon number" followed by any celebrity's name into the Google search bar.

To perform this feat, Google draws upon its Knowledge Graph -- a web of public figures, countries, famous landmarks, sports teams, and other entities and the connections between them. Google says the Knowledge Graph contains about 500 million objects, which apparently includes most actors and their filmographies. When you query an actor (or any public figure, for that matter) Google tries to trace the connections through its Knowledge Graph to arrive back at Kevin Bacon.

Apparently the Knowledge Graph has a few blind spots, though -- New York Magazine notes that it doesn't return a Bacon number for many public figures, including Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, who had cameo parts in "The Dark Knight" and "The Dark Knight Rises." (The venerable Oracle of Bacon, a site which draws its information from IMDb, informs us that Senator Leahy is two degrees removed from Kevin Bacon.)

Google does tell us the Bacon number for some non-actor public figures. Barack Obama's Bacon number is 2. So is Bill Clinton's (although Hillary doesn't seem to have one). BuzzFeed points out that former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has a Bacon number of 3, and New York Jets quarterback Tim Tebow has a Bacon number of 4. As far as we can tell, no one on the Christian Science Monitor's staff has a Bacon number.

Readers, what do you think of Google's Bacon number generator? Have you found any celebrities with unexpected Bacon numbers? Let us know in the comments section below.

To receive regular updates on how technology intersects daily life, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.