iPhone 5 will put Galaxy S III 'to shame,' says Foxconn CEO

Amid a new batch of iPhone 5 rumors, Foxconn CEO Terry Gou tees off on the latest Samsung offering. 

What will the new iPhone look like? Here, the iPhone 4S.

The buzz and mystery surrounding the new iPad has come and gone. Ditto for the MacBook Pro with the retina display. Time to start beating the drums for the next big Apple product, which will most likely be a new iPhone. In a much discussed meeting with shareholders this week, Terry Gou, the CEO of Foxconn, which manufacturers a range of devices for Apple and other hardware giants, reportedly said that the new iPhone "will put Samsung’s Galaxy S III to shame."

As we reported yesterday, the Galaxy S III was widely touted as a potential rival to the iPhone – it was enormously successful in England and landed stateside with a good deal of momentum. "This is the phone you've been waiting for," trumpeted a reviewer at TechCrunch. "It’s generally well-built, it has an incredible display, solid battery life, plenty of interesting features and it just works well." 

So what exactly will the new iPhone – let's call it the iPhone 5, for lack of a better term – bring to the table? Apple isn't saying, of course, and neither is Gou, but it stands to reason that the next iPhone will look different from the two iPhones that came before. (Generally speaking, Apple seems to go two years on one iPhone design, before adopting another – hence the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S, for instance, two iPhones cut from the same cloth.) 

Over at Macworld UK, John Cox and Mark Hattersley have assembled a pretty comprehensive roundup of iPhone 5 rumors, including speculation about some sort of "liquidmetal" chassis. Another piece of gossip that was floated first on a range of tech sites and then "confirmed" by TechCrunch: A mini 19-pin port, which would replace the longstanding 30-pin port of yesteryear. 

That, in turn, might allow Apple to make the iPhone 5 even smaller – not a bad thing at all. Of course, you'd probably need to buy brand new iPhone docks, speakers, and cables since your old ones won't fit the new design.

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.