Elaine Thompson/AP
Amazon employees protest at the company's headquarters in Seattle as part of the global climate strike Sept. 20, 2019. Big tech companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google have faced pressure both from outside critics and their own ranks to cut their carbon emissions.

Tech giants court fossil fuel firms, with some employee protests

Does cutting-edge cloud computing help oil companies clean up their businesses or just pollute more? Big tech companies grapple with best practices. 

Employee activism and outside pressure have pushed big tech companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google into promising to slash their carbon emissions. But there's another thing these tech giants aren't cutting: their growing business ties to the oil and gas industry.

When Microsoft held an all-staff meeting in September, an employee asked CEO Satya Nadella if it was ethical for the company to be selling its cloud computing services to fossil fuel companies, according to two other Microsoft employees who described the exchange on condition they not be named. Such partnerships, the worker told Mr. Nadella, were accelerating the oil companies' greenhouse gas emissions.

Microsoft and other tech giants have been competing with one another to strike lucrative partnerships with ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, and other energy firms, in many cases supplying them not just with remote data storage but also artificial intelligence tools for pinpointing better drilling spots or speeding up refinery production.

The oil and gas industry is spending roughly $20 billion each year on cloud services, which accounts for about 10% of the total cloud market, according to Vivek Chidambaram, a managing director of Accenture's energy consultancy. It's not yet clear whether the extraction industry is getting its money's worth, although experts remain bullish about the application of advanced technology to oil and gas exploration.

Mr. Nadella sought to assuage employee concerns at the Sept. 12 meeting, first by reiterating Microsoft's internal efforts on environmental sustainability, according to the workers, who asked for anonymity because they feared retaliation for speaking about an internal meeting. The employees said Mr. Nadella also defended Microsoft's energy partners, pointing out their investments in researching and developing more sustainable energy production methods.

"There's no fossil fuel CEO who sits there and says, 'You know, I'm just gonna deny climate change,'" Mr. Nadella said, according to the employees' transcript of his remarks. "If anything, they're all saying, 'Let us have, in fact, the regulation, the pricing mechanisms that get us to this future.'"

Microsoft said in an emailed statement Tuesday that it is "focused on helping companies of all kinds become more efficient, including energy companies." It declined to comment on Mr. Nadella's remarks, which were part of a regularly scheduled "all-hands" gathering in which the CEO welcomes questions on a range of topics.

Less than a week after that exchange and days before a planned worldwide protest over climate change, Microsoft announced yet another major deal for its Azure cloud computing platform – this time with Chevron and oilfield services giant Schlumberger. The timing of the announcement ahead of the climate protest and United Nations climate action meetings angered some environmentally-minded Microsoft workers and caught the attention of outsiders.

"It is unconscionable that amid global climate protests, tech giants like Microsoft are announcing major partnerships with Big Oil," said Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, in a tweet that coincided with the Sept. 20 global climate strike . "We must hold them accountable, demand they break ties with the fossil fuel industry, and move rapidly to sustainable energy."

Echoing that message was a small group of Microsoft employees who carried cardboard signs to a lunchtime protest that day outside of Microsoft's headquarters in Redmond, Washington. "No Azure For Oil," said one of the signs.

After months of employee activism, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said he was pushing his company to the forefront on sustainability, committing it to have 100% of its energy use come from solar panels and other renewable energy by 2030. But he also defended Amazon's work with the oil and gas industry, arguing that "we need to help them instead of vilify them."

Some experts say AI and cloud services could actually play a role in curbing emissions.

Denying cloud computing services to the oil and gas industry would do little to address the bigger problem of the world's ongoing dependence on fossil fuels, said Aseem Prakash, director of the Center for Environmental Politics at the University of Washington.

"We would not want to collapse the fossil fuel industry," Mr. Prakash said. "We would want a soft landing."

If anything, he said, an oil company's shift to another company's cloud platform may have some environmental benefits because it is more efficient than running its digital operations on its own servers. Driving down costs could also help open the door to investments in other, less polluting methods for generating energy.

It's less clear whether AI is mitigating pollution or worsening it. In their pitches to work with oil and gas companies, cloud providers such as Amazon and Microsoft have boasted of advanced machine-learning tools that can sift through huge troves of geologic and seismic data to help make decisions about where to extract resources. International Data Corporation oil analyst Gaurav Verma said AI is a critical technology for oil and gas companies that want to learn from that data to study oil reservoirs or predict when maintenance is needed on a pipeline.

Earlier this year, ExxonMobil struck a deal to tap into Microsoft's technology to capitalize on the shale oil boom in Texas and New Mexico. Microsoft has said that real-time data collected from a region spanning hundreds of miles would enable ExxonMobil "to make faster and better decisions" on drilling and well completion and support production growth by as much as 50,000 oil-equivalent barrels per day by 2025.

An unsigned statement from Microsoft's protesting workers said they've been "made complicit" by the company's role in warming the planet.

"Microsoft makes millions of dollars in profits by helping fossil fuel companies extract more oil," the statement said.

But it's not clear if tech giants are actually helping that much – in part because they may be overstating their own role in transforming Big Oil with AI.

"The sundae they're selling is the cloud," said Mr. Chidambaram, the Accenture analyst. "The cherries they're putting on it is the analytics."

Mr. Chidambaram said that's because oil industries are still cagey about sharing what they know about underground reserves and don't want third parties analyzing that data.

Mr. Chidambaram said in the long run, however, AI could actually help meet climate goals. For example, machines that can capture better data and quickly analyze it could also help detect and reduce the leakage of methane from wells and pipelines, a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.

"Data can be used in many ways," he said. "It's about how it's being used."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tech giants court fossil fuel firms, with some employee protests
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today