When will self-driving cars be affordable? 2025, says Ford.

Ford announced Monday it would have an entirely autonomous vehicle available to the general public by 2025. But Ford isn't using the same technology as Tesla. 

Eduardo Munoz/Reuters/File
President and chief executive officer of Ford Motor Company Mark Fields speaks with reporters during the media preview of the 2016 New York International Auto Show in Manhattan, New York March 23, 2016.

In the rapidly developing self-driving car industry, both tech and automobile companies are collaborating and competing to manufacture an accessible and affordable autonomous vehicle, and to make it readily available to consumers.

On Monday, Ford laid down a marker, saying its driverless cars will be for sale by 2025.

“We’re dedicated to putting autonomous vehicles on the road for millions of people, not just those who can afford luxury cars,” said Mark Fields, chief executive officer for Ford, on Monday at their headquarters, reported the International Business Times.

The comment about luxury cars may have been a reference to potential industry leader in self-driving vehicles, Tesla Motors, whose Model S starts with a price tag over $60,000, comes equipped with a functional autopilot that will steer within a lane, change lanes, and park on command. According to the Tesla website, their most recent software update includes a “Summon” feature that, “lets you ‘call’ your car from your phone so it can come greet you at the front door in the morning.”

While the Tesla features are innovating, Ford’s sights set on having standard features for all. “We may not be first, but when we do come out with it, we want to make sure that it’s accessible to millions,” Mr. Fields continued in his Monday address. His company’s focus is on safety and accessibility.

Believing that even the semiautonomous driving technology isn’t yet capable of providing the level of safety to which Ford aspires, they have chosen to move slower in their pursuit of a self-driving car.

“We’ve not been able to do that with cameras and radar,” said Raj Nair, the development chief of Ford’s autonomous vehicle program in reference to the systems utilized by Tesla’s Autopilot, quoted by The New York Times. “Not to the safety level we would be comfortable for introducing that into production.”

Again, that's another only slightly veiled criticism of Tesla's autonomous system

Instead, Ford (and Google) has chosen to utilize lidar (Light Detection and Ranging), a more expensive type of remote sensing system that uses laser beams to measure the distance and composition of objects, as well as cameras and computer chips, in their careful pursuit of safe self-driving technology.

And so in the next five years Ford plans to slowly release autonomous vehicles into a controlled urban environment from which they can refine their systems.

Ultimately, however, Ford aims to compete with the other manufacturers in creating self-driving vehicles for ride-hailing programs, similar to those already outlined by both tech giants Tesla and Google, including Uber, which is working with Volvo to start testing autonomous taxis in Pittsburgh in the coming days

According to Mr. Fields, Ford plans to have a fleet of self-driving vehicles on the roads for ride-hail operations by 2021, with the intention of then having consumer-oriented, affordable autonomous vehicles ready for purchase by 2025.

That time frame will put them just behind BMW, which announced earlier this summer that it plans to be mass-producing its own self-driving car by 2021. Meanwhile Audi and Nissan have both announced prototypes for autonomous vehicles but have yet to disclose a target launch date.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.