Tesla’s Model 3: too much demand, too little capacity to deliver?

Company CEO Elon Musk contends that the company has learned from past mistakes, and promises 2018 delivery.

|
Tesla Motors via AP
The photo shows the Model 3 car. The promise of an affordable electric car from Tesla Motors had hundreds of people lining up to reserve one. At a starting price of $35,000 — before federal and state government incentives — the Model 3 is less than half the cost of Tesla's previous models.

Within just the 24 hours Tesla’s launch of its Model 3, the company received 180,000 pre-orders orders, and up to 276,000 within 72 hours. And as of Thursday, the orders had increased up to 325,000, the company announced.

The enthusiasm for the electric car – which is set to sell at an average price of $42,000 – continues to soar. Yet many still wonder if the company’s deliveries will match the pre-orders.

Its most recent vehicle, the "falcon-wing" Model X SUV, was expected to arrive mid 2014, but was only delivered to customers in late 2015.

On Monday the company announced that it delivered 14,820 vehicles in the first quarter including 12,420 Model S sedans and 2,400 Model X utility vehicles, 2,000 short of the 16,000 deliveries that it had promised to deliver in the first quarter.

At the unveiling of the Model 3 last week, Company Chief Executive Elon Musk contended that they had learned from their past mistakes, adding that he felt “fairly confident” that the electric vehicle would be delivered next year.  Mr. Musk has touted the company’s potential, saying its Fremont production facility has the capability to produce up 500,000 vehicles. But he also admitted the production planning would have to change in order to meet the demands.

“I think the mistake we made with the Model X, which I really think we’ve taken to heart at Tesla, is that we put too many new features and technologies, too many great things all at once, into a product.”

Some analysts agree that Tesla might be able to deliver if the new model doesn’t involve a complicated design that would require more production time.

“If they have less bells and whistles, which they probably will, the production should be a bit easier from that standpoint,”Jessica Caldwell, senior analyst at Edmunds.com, told the Los Angeles Times. “They're producing a higher number [of vehicles], but the complexity of production would be less.”

But others are still skeptical. As the Daily Beast’s Edward Niedermeyer put it:

“It’s highly unusual for an automaker to preview a production vehicle so far from its actual launch date for a variety of reasons: as Musk admits, the car is likely to change during the next two years of development work. In the meantime, a heavily hyped but unavailable car could cut into demand for Tesla’s existing models. With Tesla’s cash reserves falling below $1 billion and dwindling fast, the company might not survive long enough to launch the car people are currently lined up for.”

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tesla’s Model 3: too much demand, too little capacity to deliver?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0407/Tesla-s-Model-3-too-much-demand-too-little-capacity-to-deliver
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe