Could a Fredkin gate be the next quantum leap forward for computing?

Building quantum computers is tricky business, with a range of obstacles to overcome, but scientists have had a recent breakthrough with a new circuit that could speed up development.

Jon Simon/Feature Photo Service for IBM
IBM Research scientist Jerry Chow conducts a quantum computing experiment at IBM's Thomas J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, N.Y. IBM is one of several companies working on developing quantum computers.

The laundry list of obstacles to developing quantum computers just got a little shorter with a recent scientific breakthrough.

Scientists have built a new computer chip capable of overcoming one of the key obstacles to building quantum computers. The quantum Fredkin gate is a vital piece of quantum computing that was previously too complex to build, but scientists have found a way to simplify the process.

By simplifying one of the basic parts of a quantum computer, the team behind the breakthrough hopes it will make building functional quantum computers more feasible and unlock the massive potential behind the advanced computers.

"Similar to building a huge wall out of lots of small bricks, large quantum circuits require very many logic gates to function. However, if larger bricks are used the same wall could be built with far fewer bricks," said Dr Raj Patel, one of the lead scientists behind the breakthrough.

Quantum computers are far more complex than traditional computers. The Christian Science Monitor’s Jeff Ward-Bailey described the difference in December:

Super computers use the “traditional digital design in which each bit represents either a 0 or a 1. But quantum computers, which were first proposed in the 1980s, have atom-sized bits that can represent 0, 1, or a ‘superposition’ of both 0 and 1 at the same time.”

The result is quantum computer circuits that need to incorporate a vast amount of smaller parts in order to function.

Fredkin gates are just one part of a quantum computer circuit, a place where two quantum bits can be changed or swapped depending on a third value. But to build one Fredkin gate requires five logic operations. Add in the required amount of Fredkin gates and soon a circuit would be bustling with far too many components to be realistically made.

Scientists from Griffith University and the University of Queensland found a way to construct Fredkin gates while simplifying the amount of logic operations needed. The team used particles of light.

"The research team used the quantum entanglement of photons – particles of light – to implement the controlled-SWAP operation directly," the press release states.

Simpler Fredkin gates will hopefully mean simper quantum computer circuits.

What’s makes quantum computing worth the difficulties?

"The allure of quantum computers is the unparalleled processing power that they provide compared to current technology," said Dr. Patel.

Scientists, governments, and large corporations seek powerful computers for a number of activities from modeling air traffic control and molecular compositions to predicting weather events and cracking passwords. The more complex the operation and the more independent variables need to be simulated, the more processing power is required. 

Tianhe-2, the world's current fastest supercomputer can do 34 quadrillion floating-point operations a second and takes up 8,000 square-feet of space. [Editor's note: An earlier version misstated Tianhe-2's performance.]

A quantum computer would be able to solve in one second a problem that could stump a traditional computer for 10,000 years, Hartmut Neven, director of engineering at Google, said. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.