Facebook tries to deliver more meaningful content, less clickbait

Facebook tweaked its News Feed algorithm to try to give more prominence to stories that people find meaningful, but don't necessarily get a lot of clicks or likes.

Paul Sakuma/AP/File
A sign with the Facebook "Like" logo is seen at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. on December 13, 2011.

Facebook is changing its News Feed algorithm in an attempt to deliver more meaning and less clickbait to its users.

Until now, Facebook has bumped up the visibility of certain stories based on the number of clicks, likes, and comments those stories receive. The more people click on a story, the higher it rises in others’ feeds, making it more likely to receive further clicks.

But that system encourages clickbait, Facebook found, with sites writing intentionally provocative headlines (“You won’t believe what happens next …”) to try to gain more visibility.

Now, Facebook is tweaking its algorithm to include more stories that people enjoy but don’t necessarily click or comment on.

The company surveyed more than 1,000 people about how the content they see on Facebook could be improved, and also asked tens of thousands of users to rate the stories on their News Feed from one to five stars. Facebook discovered that many people like seeing certain kinds of content even if they don’t click the “like” button or leave a comment. In other words, there’s a disconnect between how much people report wanting to see certain kinds of stories, and how much they actually click on stories.

“The actions people take on Facebook—liking, clicking, commenting or sharing a post—are historically some of the main factors considered to determine what to show at the top of your News Feed,” Facebook software engineers Cheng Zhang and Si Chen wrote in a blog post. “But these factors don’t always tell us the whole story of what is most meaningful to you.”

To better make that determination, Facebook may rely on factors such as the amount of time a user spends looking at a story, or whether the story contains keywords that match things the user has posted in the past. (If you post a lot of statuses about dinosaurs, there’s a good chance you’ll be interested in paleontology news.)

Whether something is “meaningful” or not is highly subjective, and no algorithm can perfectly predict what people will want to see online. But Facebook’s new algorithm may do a better job of balancing quantitative measures such as clicks with qualitative judgments about what people find meaningful. In the process, it may also help tamp down on inflammatory headlines and the practice of directly asking users to click on a story.

These practices “will likely only cause temporary spikes in metrics that might then be rebalanced by feed’s ranking over time,” the Facebook engineers wrote.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.