Will 10,000-character tweets work for Twitter?

On Tuesday, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey confirmed rumors that Twitter is considering a 10,000-character limit for tweets. 

Eric Risberg/AP/File
Twitter headquarters in San Francisco in 2014. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey confirmed on Tuesday that Twitter is considering a 10,000 character limit for tweets.

Is 140 characters too short?

Twitter co-founder and CEO Jack Dorsey confirmed possible changes to Twitter's platform on Tuesday when he unveiled plans to consider expanding the limit to 10,000 characters at the end of March.

This potential change comes on the heels of Mr. Dorsey's return to the company's CEO position in October, following a short stint as acting CEO. Dorsey previously held that job until 2008. According to USA Today, Twitter's leadership shakeup was the company's response to slow user growth. Tuesday's announcement is just one of many user interface changes intended to make the product more accessible to mainstream users.

Dorsey's Tuesday afternoon tweet framed the possibility of longer tweets as a way to give users more freedom. He praised the "creativity and brevity" of the 140-character limit, calling it a "beautiful constraint." Instead of changing Twitter's identity altogether, Dorsey expressed hopes that an expanded limit would promote the platform's "conversational nature" and empower those who might feel constrained by 140 characters.

The Wall Street Journal notes that Twitter users have a history of finding imaginative ways to circumvent character limits.

Some users use "tweetstorms," a method of posting a single message through multiple, numbered tweets. Others take screenshots of longer posts and then upload the images. That's what Dorsey did with his 1,317-character announcement.

The potential character-limit expansion prompted individuals to consider the impact that longer tweets would have on the nature of Twitter and its users. Many responses were negative.

Some expressed concern that longer limits would alter the character of the platform, making it more like Facebook. 

Others pointed to Twitter's lack of certain other features:

Twitter has not turned a profit since its 2006 launch, but has been an integral part of Internet culture for nearly a decade.  

Although often criticized as a platform for so-called hashtag activism, Twitter has played a very real role in popular protest and political change.

According to an article in The Atlantic last year, We the Protesters activist DeRay Mckesson used Twitter heavily to report on the situation in Ferguson, Mo., last year. He credits the platform with enabling him to reach a broader audience.

Others have used Twitter to cover breaking stories such as the Arab Spring, or to organize protests such as those against the kidnapping of 219 Nigerian schoolgirls by the militant Islamist group Boko Haram.

One Wall Street Journal article about Dorsey's statement on Tuesday indicated that expanded character limits would allow news outlets to post content directly to the platform, rather than posting links that take traffic away from Twitter itself.

Will the extra characters change Twitter's character? A 10,000-character limit could measurably change Twitter's content, but perhaps not its message of individual empowerment. As Dorsey tweeted, "We're not going to be shy about building more utility and power into Twitter for people. As long as it's consistent with what people want to do, we're going to explore it."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.