Five times Internet activism made a difference

From the Arab Spring to SOPA to #blacklivesmatter, here’s a look at how online activism has impacted social issues across the globe.

2. Arab Spring

Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor/File
Protesters use their cell phones to photograph memorials for those who lost their lives during demonstrations in Tahrir Square in Cairo on February 9, 2011.

Like Iran’s Green Movement demanding the removal of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad two years earlier, Twitter and Facebook were often cited for their impact in the massive protests unfolding in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya in 2011 demanding the ouster of authoritarian, military-backed regimes.

Despite many media outlets hailing the impact of social media on the Arab spring, analysts and observers say it was never only the “revolution Twitter built.” Instead, Twitter emerged as a key broadcasting tool, allowing reports of atrocities against protesters and demonstrations in Tunisia to spread to media outlets around the globe despite efforts by governments to block or censor local sites that covered them.

In Syria, traditional activist movements also freed up local blogs and news sites to talk directly about the government of Bashar al-Assad. “The street led the bloggers,” said Marcell Shewaro, who left Syria for Cairo in June 2011, after veiled threats from the government over her three-year-old Arabic blog. She spoke with the Monitor in 2011.

“Three months ago, I can't speak about Bashar, even in a restaurant. Now we are saying, 'OK, they [the protesters] are dying. What we can do is write. If we don't talk, it's now or never.' And stories are coming out, all over, even from the 1980s, because people are feeling they are not alone,” she adds, noting that she has about 50,000 readers a month.

In Egypt, the decision by then-President Hosni Mubarak to block Facebook and Twitter in anticipation of a growing protest in Cairo’s Tahrir Square proved to a be a "grave mistake" that would lead to the toppling of the authoritarian regime, activist Wael Ghonim wrote in a 2012 book.

For Mr. Ghonim, Facebook proved to be a key organizing tool, as he set up a page raising awareness about the death of Khaled Said, a 28-year-man allegedly murdered by police in Alexandria in 2010 after he posted a video of their corruption online. After setting up a page titled “We Are All Khaled Said," he proposed a large protest in Cairo’s Tahrir Square set for Jan. 25, later to be known as the "Day of Rage."

Using social media, he argued, set off the Mubarak government’s largest fear, of a public opposition movement not connected to a single individual. "The Egyptian regime lived in fear of opposition. It sought to project a façade of democracy, giving the impression that Egypt was advancing toward political rights and civil liberties while it vanquished any dissidents who threatened to mobilize enough support to force real change," he wrote.

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.