Twitter's new diversity hire raises eyebrows

Despite criticism for its lack of women and minorities in the workforce, Twitter has hired a white man to lead its diversity efforts. 

Eric Thayer/Reuters
A portrait of the Twitter logo in Ventura, California in this file photo from December 21, 2013.

Amid prevailing criticism for its lack of employee diversity, Twitter has hired a white man as its new diversity chief.

The San Francisco company announced Tuesday that Jeffrey Siminoff, former diversity chief for Apple, will replace Janet Van Huysse as the company’s vice president of diversity and inclusion. The transition was confirmed by their respective posts on Twitter.

Most tech companies continue to struggle to attain diversity in workforce. Based on a Fortune survey that looks at nine major Silicon Valley firms conducted this summer, most tech companies are comprised of white or Asian males. On average, only about one-third of employees are women, and the gap widens at higher levels of the corporate ladder.

The same dismal fractions apply for minority workers. More than a quarter of Twitter's 302 million active users are black, yet only 2 percent of its workforce is African American.

While Mr. Siminoff was the co-founder of Out Leadership, a lesbian, gay and transgender advocacy organization, his tenure at Apple prompted minimal change for the company’s diversity.

Among Twitter’s most vocal critics is civil rights leader, the Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, Sr. A staunch advocate for more minorities in tech, he often attends shareholders meetings in Silicon Valley.

“I thought that these tech companies would have been more inclusive, but they are way behind,” he said in an interview, according to The New York Times. “What’s astonishing to me is that these companies, with their liberal facades, resist our work.”

As reported by USA Today, Jackson is disappointed Twitter’s hiring of Siminoff.

"Blacks and Latinos over-index on using Twitter, but their board of directors and C-suite leadership remain all white," Jackson said. "Jeff [Siminoff] has a big mountain to climb, a tough task ahead. We hope he and Twitter’s leadership is up to the challenge."

Diversity proponents on Twitter have also used the social media outlet to criticize its decision.

"Not saying a white guy can't be head of diversity, but for a company that hires a majority white guys it sends the wrong message," writer Mark S. Luckie tweeted.

As Siminoff prepares to officially join Twitter in January, the company continues in its pledge to increase diversity. In August, Twitter released a list of diversity goals for 2016, including raising female employment overall to 35 percent and underrepresented minorities to 11 percent. Founder and CEO Jack Dorsey has also expressed his commitment to the aspiration.

Issues of diversity have often been attributed to the education pipeline – there’s a popular belief that there are simply fewer girls and minorities pursuing math and science. But as Forbes’ Bonnie Marcus points out, the number of high school girls and boys in STEM classes may actually be equal. The real issue, she said, is of culture.

Leslie Miley, a former Twitter engineer, attested to this claim in his reflections of working for the company:

Twitter’s issues with growth and engagement and the issues with internal diversity are somewhat related. The over-reliance on a limited number of schools and workplaces for talent has caused a type of group think to dominate. Any change would be approved by people who all think alike. There was very little diversity in thought and almost no diversity in action.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Twitter's new diversity hire raises eyebrows
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today