'Back to the Future Part II': Did the movie get it right?

In the 1989 film, Marty McFly visits the future on October 21, 2015. How does our world today compare to the film's predictions over 25 years ago?

Pepsi/AP Images
Pepsi gifts early released bottles of Pepsi Perfect to 200 Marty McFly cos players at New York Comic Con in celebration of the 30th anniversary of the Back to the Future movie on Oct. 8, 2015.

For the most avid "Back to the Future" fans, Michael J. Fox is expected to roll down the street on a hover board Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 4:29 p.m.

In the 1989 film "Back to the Future Part II," Fox’s character Marty McFly travels to the date Oct. 21, 2015. 

While Marty is reading the headlines of an October 2015 USA Today, viewers catch a glimpse of some headlines. Judging by these headlines, the filmmakers thought the United States would have a female president in 2015, Queen Elizabeth would have passed on the crown to Queen Diana, and someone would have run a three-minute mile.

The film was big at the time, and arguably shaped millions of viewers concepts of the future. After adjusting for inflation and averaging the gross across the entire series, The Atlantic suggests the "Back the the Future" trilogy brought in more at the box office than the Batman, James Bond, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Twilight series. 

And while we still don’t have hoverboards like Marty, engineers have certainly tried. 

Both Lexus and Hendo have produced hoverboard prototypes, but they only work on specific magnetic surfaces. Proving the popular envy of Marty’s hoverboard technology, Hendo funded a ‘Betaboard’ in August through a Kickstarter campaign that had 3,169 backers pledge a total of $510,590.

John Bell, the film’s visual effects art director, and Bob Gale, who wrote and produced the film, told The New York Times that their futuristic inventions were based off of imagination and not realistic predictions.

“I just started taking stabs at anything from the vehicles, to the hoverboards to the costumes and town square, where Marty lived,” Mr. Bell said.

“We were all just driving to the unknown,” costume designer Joanna Johnston told the Times. “So everyone was going: ‘What about this? What about this? But what about this?’”

“I was told [by director Robert Zemeckis] that people were going to be wearing their athletic clothes all day, which they didn’t then,” Ms. Johnston notes. “And now they do all the time.” 

What about the drone dog walker in the film? “We though that was kind of a joke,” Mr. Gale added, “but that’s going to happen.”

And surprisingly, many of the far-fetched, obscure predictions in the film actually have come true.

Video conferencing, self-lacing Nike sneakers, flat-screen TVs, a professional baseball team in Florida, tablet computers, and hands-free video games were all a prediction in the late 1980s, but are common concepts now.

Well, self-lacing Nike sneakers might not be so common, but the company has confirmed they exist.

Although viewers might see the predicted fax machine as an obvious development, “We missed the smartphone completely,” Gale notes.

Pepsi is also celebrating the "Back to the Future" holiday, releasing 6,500 bottles of Marty’s drink of choice in the film – Pepsi Perfect – online Wednesday for $20.15 apiece.

And as for the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series? We can’t know for sure yet, but it is still a possibility. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Back to the Future Part II': Did the movie get it right?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today