5.6 million fingerprints stolen in OPM hack: What can thieves do with data?

The latest estimate of fingerprints exposed during the breach is five times higher than first reported. 

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/File
A traveler has his fingerprints scanned at the airport in 2008.

The millions of fingerprint images stolen in one of the US government’s biggest data breaches could help Chinese intelligence identify American spies abroad, federal officials say.

On Wednesday, the Office of Personnel Management announced that the number of people whose security clearance data had been stolen is now believed to be 5.6 million, five times the original size of the breach. Authorities believe the hack may have been carried out by a Chinese operation, affecting around 21.5 million current and former federal employees or job applicants.

Experts say “the theft could give Chinese intelligence a huge leg up in recruiting informants inside the U.S. government,” reports The Associated Press. Forms provided by the employees include identifying information about friends and family in the US and abroad, which could save the Chinese years of intelligence gathering on its recruitment process.

Though the White House has not publicly blamed China for the attack, US national security advisor Susan Rice warned China on Monday that government-authorized cyber espionage must stop.

"This isn't a mild irritation, it's an economic and national security concern to the United States," said Ms. Rice as she delivered remarks at George Washington University, according to Reuters. “It puts enormous strain on our bilateral relationship, and it is a critical factor in determining the future trajectory of US-China ties.”

The warning came days ahead of Chinese president President Xi Jinping's first state visit to the White House on Thursday, where he and President Obama are expected to discuss climate change and human rights issues, according to The New York Times.

Despite Rice’s earlier warning, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said on Wednesday he did not "have any conclusions to share publicly about who may or may not have been responsible."

Intelligence officials have downplayed the danger posed by the breach, and even called it “a fair intelligence target, one the U.S. would pursue if it had the chance,” reported the AP.

The hack has cost the agency director her job. Intelligence officials say the full extent of damage will be determined over the course of years and may never be fully revealed to the public.

This report contains material from The Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 5.6 million fingerprints stolen in OPM hack: What can thieves do with data?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today