Chile earthquake: How good is Pacific tsunami warning system?

Previous disasters have created a more robust network of warning centers and cross-national collaboration. 

Marco Garcia/AP
A outrigger canoe paddles past Diamond Head mountain on Sept. 16, 2015 in Honolulu. A magnitude-8.3 earthquake hit near Chile's northern coast Wednesday night, putting Hawaii under a tsunami advisory. Diamond Head is unusually green due to recent heavy rains.

Tsunami warning systems are usually built in the aftermath of epic waves. After a half century of brutal lessons learned, the Pacific tsunami safety net has grown into a robust network of observatories, buoys, and international collaboration.  

A powerful magnitude-8.3 earthquake struck just off the coast of Chile on Wednesday evening, generating a dangerous 15-foot tsunami along parts of the Chilean coast and triggering tsunami advisories in Hawaii and southern California.

The tsunami is expected to fan out across much of the Pacific Ocean, according to The Weather Channel. Its power is concentrated westward toward French Polynesia, including Tahiti, with the lead tsunami waves already reaching as far west as the Chatham Islands (part of New Zealand), where a 1.2 foot wave height was measured at Owenga.

Official tsunami warning capability in the US began in 1949, in response to a 1946 tsunami generated in the Aleutian Islands that wreaked havoc on Hilo, Hawaii. The federal government already housed the Honolulu Geomagnetic Observatory in ʻEwa Beach, and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center moved in.

Following the 1960 Chilean earthquake and tsunami which devastated Chile and killed dozens in Hawaii, and as many as 200 people in Japan, Pacific nations moved to coordinate efforts. Under direction from the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) established the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Pacific Tsunami Warning System (ICG/PTWS) in 1968. The US offered the ʻEwa Beach center as the operational headquarters.

Similarly, in Alaska, PTWC issued tsunami warnings until 1967 when the West Coast & Alaska Tsunami Warning Center (WCATWC) was established in response to the 1964 Alaskan earthquake and tsunami. In 1982, the WCATWC area of responsibility was enlarged to include California, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia.

In the aftermath of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami that claimed 230,000 lives, including some 170,000 in northern Indonesia alone, PTWC has taken on additional areas of responsibility, including the Indian Ocean, the South China Sea, the Caribbean Sea, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands, according to NOAA. PTWC's staff nearly doubled as a result of that tsunami – from 8 to 15 – and it now staffs the center around the clock.

A vital part of tsunami detection are deep ocean sensors that measure pressure from the sea floor and ping satellites with real-time data. Prior to the 2004 tsunami, there were 6 such buoys in places across the Pacific Ocean, in places NOAA deemed most at risk for big wave activity. Following the 2004 tsunami, the array was expanded to 39 buoys.

As the Christian Science Monitor previously reported, an magnitude-8.6 earthquake off of northern Indonesia in 2012 tested the systems put in place following the 2004 devastation:

Made up of seismographic stations and deep-ocean sensors, the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System was activated in June 2006 after an agreement at a United Nations conference in Japan.

When a quake hits, data is sent to the Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre in Hawaii and the Japan Meteorological Agency, which coordinate with national tsunami centres in the region.

It can take 15 to 20 minutes for quake data to be analysed and a tsunami watch to be issued to governments and the public around the Indian Ocean. Using their own data, nations warn citizens in a variety of ways – from radio, television, and text messages to sirens and mosque loudspeakers.

In Sri Lanka, officials pressed a "tsunami evacuation" button from an emergency control room in Colombo that alerted 75 warning towers across the island. Within 20 minutes, three million people had moved from the seashore to safer places.

At the time, Keith Loveard, chief risk analyst at Jakarta-based security firm Concord Consulting said, "The tsunami alert system worked to a degree.... While awareness has improved, reinforced by 2004, it still needs to get better through public education and government campaigns."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.