Google's Project Sunroof: How it could help you save with solar power

Google’s new online service shows consumers how much they can save by turning to solar energy.

Screen grab/Project Sunroof
Project Sunroof, Google's new online service, uses the company's satellite technology to provide users with an estimate of how much sun their roofs get over the course of a year, and how much they can save by switching to solar power.

Google wants to make it that much easier to go solar.

The company on Monday launched Project Sunroof, a new online service that taps into Google’s growing capacities in satellite imagery and artificial intelligence to give consumers a comprehensive look at how much they would save by swapping their traditional power source for solar energy.

The project, currently available for residents of San Francisco, Boston, and Fresno, Calif., is the latest investment to tie Google to renewable energy sources – and solar in particular – and could be a step towards making solar power more accessible and easy to use.

“As the price of installing solar has gotten less expensive, more homeowners are turning to it as a possible option for decreasing their energy bill,” according to Google. “We want to make installing solar panels easy and understandable for anyone.”

To that end, the company developed what is essentially a search engine that relies on the same technology that Google Earth uses to map cities all over the world. The user types in an address, and Project Sunroof creates a 3D model of that location’s roof structure. It then estimates how much sunlight that roof gets in one year and how much the homeowner might save over the next 20.

“People search Google all the time to learn about solar,” Joel Conkling, a renewable energy investment expert with Google, told Wired. “But it would be much more helpful if they could learn whether their particular roof is a good fit.”

Solar energy is the fastest-growing renewable energy source in the United States today and, along with wind, accounts for two-thirds of renewable growth in the country, the US Energy Information Administration reported in May.

Advocates tout solar’s advantages, Vox’s David Roberts noted: unlike other sources of electricity, including hydropower, photovoltaic (PV) panels eschew the use of turbines and convert solar energy directly into electricity. That process, Mr. Roberts wrote, makes solar energy clean, low-maintenance, and, once the initial investment is paid off, low-cost.

But solar comes with disadvantages as well, the most obvious being its dependence on the sun.

“Solar radiation is rarely constant and varies with changing atmospheric conditions (clouds and dust), and the changing position of the Earth relative to the sun,” the Institute for Energy Research points out. And although the sun’s energy comes free, “the cost of the technology relative to the amount of energy produced makes solar significantly more expensive than other more widely used energy sources,” posing a challenge to the large-scale use of solar energy.

Indeed, “The past decade has been a remarkable time for the solar industry,” Francis O’Sullivan, director of research and analysis at MIT’s Energy Initiative, told The Christian Science Monitor. “However, continued rapid growth in solar is not an inevitability.”

Google, for its part, has been working to change that. In the last few years the tech giant has invested millions in solar energy in the US and elsewhere, including $12 million into a 96-megawatt (MW) solar PV plant in South Africa; $280 million into California-based solar provider SolarCity; and $80 million in utility-scale solar facilities across California and Arizona.

The company plans to profit, too. For Project Sunroof, the idea is to eventually recommend solar providers to users and pick up a referral fee from those providers, Wired reports. “We want to help people understand the potential of solar power,” Mr. Conkling told the magazine. “But we can make some money off of that as well.”

Follow CSMonitor's board Tech & Innovation on Pinterest.
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.