Ashley Madison: 'Moral' hacking or old-fashioned stealing?

2015 will be a banner year for cyber thieves, warns an expert. Did morality really motivate the Ashley Madison hackers, or just profit?

Lee Jin-man/AP/File
A man looks at Ashley Madison's Korean web site on his computer in Seoul, South Korea. Avid Life Media Inc., the parent company of Ashley Madison, a matchmaking website for cheating spouses, reported late Sunday that it was hacked and that the personal information of some of its users was posted online.

Hackers: 1, Ashley Madison: 0.

The website has now secured its servers, but it has also agreed to a demand that they allow users to erase their profiles for free, according to a statement released Monday.

Ashley Madison, a site that facilitates secret extramarital affairs for its 37 million users, had previously charged $19 to remove their profiles. "As our customers' privacy is of the utmost concern to us, we are now offering our full-delete option free to any member, in light of today’s news," it said.

The hackers responsible, who go by the name "The Impact Team," managed to steal information from Ashley Madison’s entire client base and even leaked some of the data online. It had claimed that the company was lying about deleting former clients’ information from their servers and was instead keeping data like their names and billing details online. The hackers demanded that the site be permanently shut down and threatened to release the personal information of millions of the site's cheating users.

Ashley Madison denied that it lied about removing users' information from their servers. "The process involves a hard-delete of a requesting user’s profile, including the removal of posted pictures and all messages sent to other system users’ email boxes," it said.

Hacks like Ashley Madison's are becoming more common. Last year saw a record high in the number of US data breaches, according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC). Nearly 800 breaches were reported, almost a third more than the number in 2013.

While some breaches are accidental, the leading cause of data breaches is hacking, said the ITRC.

"Without a doubt, 2015 will see more massive takedowns, hacks, and exposure of sensitive personal information like we have witnessed in years past," Adam Levin, founder of cybersecurity firm IDT911, told the ITRC.

He added, "Medical data and business information like intellectual property will be prime targets, with cyber thieves looking for opportunistic financial gain based on black market value, corporate extortion, and cyber terrorism."

The Ashley Madison case may prove to be an extortionate attack, though some maintain that The Impact Team is trying to exemplify "a case of moral vigilantism."

One hacker interviewed by Sky News denied that the group was morally motivated. "They have a better chance of selling on to someone else or to a 'Blackhat Market' on the 'Deep Web.' They’ll profit from this in a big way, especially with the size of this database," said the insider, identified only as "Vinnie."

He added that the hacking community was impressed at the size of the breach and doubted the group would be able to pull off such an attack again, according to Sky News.

The latest attack exposes critical security flaws in a company that claims to work with "leading IT vendors from around the world," and could even threaten Ashley Madison’s plans for an IPO, reported Marketwatch.

Follow CSMonitor's board Tech & Innovation on Pinterest.
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.