Can marketers woo millennials with esports?

As the likes of AT&T and McDonalds look to win over a younger generation, they may have found a solution in electronic sports games.

Matthias Rietschel
File - A participant plays a computer game during the Intel Friday Night Game, a competition of the ESL, Electronic Sports League, in Dresden, Germany.

The latest ally in competitive gaming's fight for mainstream awareness just might be marketers.

At an intimate, invite-only gathering this week at an exclusive seaside resort, executives from corporations like AT&T, State Farm and McDonald's were looking to electronic sports to potentially capture new consumers. While esports now regularly draws tens of millions of spectators both online and in person, the genre continues to battle for broader recognition in North America.

"There is definitely an awareness issue across mainstream elements," said Dustin Beck, vice president of esports and merchandising at "League of Legends" publisher Riot Games. "We want this to be a successful ecosystem for decades to come, and that will be buoyed by having larger brands, like those here, who become aware of esports and get involved in esports."

Beck was among the attendees Wednesday at the sixth annual PTTOW! summit, an exclusive get-together of execs interested in reaching young consumers. Other subjects discussed at PTTOW! — which stands for "Plan To Take On the World" — included virtual reality, globalization and predictive marketing, with esports among the summit's most popular topics.

"Our job is to tell people what they don't know," said Roman Tsunder, co-founder and CEO of PTTOW! "Who wants to talk about something everyone knows about? Everyone here is the best in the world at what they do, and esports was important to include because enough people mentioned it. That's notable because there's $68 million of media investment in this room."

Over the past 10 years, the popularity of esports has amplified as technology has evolved, Internet speeds have become more reliable and a generation of gamers has grown up watching competitive bouts on streaming video sites like Twitch and YouTube. Earlier this year, a report released by research firm Newzoo said 205 million people watched esports in 2014.

However, a divide continues to frustrate the medium. The broadcast of a collegiate tournament for Blizzard's upcoming game "Heroes of the Storm" drew only about 100,000 viewers when it aired last month on ESPN2. It also inspired ire. ESPN radio host Colin Cowherd later remarked that he would retire if he was "ever forced to cover guys playing video games."

Several major companies don't share that sentiment.

Intel, Red Bull, Nissan, Coca-Cola and others have been regularly sponsoring esports athletes and organizations in an attempt to reach those elusive millennials who have cut the cord, streaming "Dota 2" matches on smartphones instead of watching Major League Baseball matchups on televisions. For many marketers, it's about more than simply advertising products.

"I have a very clear job," said Matt Wolf, global head of gaming for Coca-Cola. "My job is to sell more Coca-Cola. But I also love the gaming industry. I grew up in the gaming industry, so why can't I grow our brands with the power of games and, at the same time, shine a positive light on the gaming community and remove stereotypes? It's an incredibly powerful medium."

Coca-Cola kicked off a partnership with Riot Games last year by sponsoring a "League of Legends" amateur league for players to compete for a spot in the professional one. The beverage company expanded its relationship with the game publisher this year with plans to broadcast the May 10 mid-season invitational in 15 movie theaters across the United States.

Despite the popularity and Coke partnership, competition alone has yet to prove profitable for Riot Games.

"It's something our fans love, so we're going to continue to do it," said Beck. "We're in it for the long haul. Is it profitable now? No, but we have the luxury of not rushing to monetize it, so we can keep it a genuine and authentic experience. It'd be great if we could have more partners come on board to add value, not just monetarily, but also for the fan experience."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.