Live-streaming apps: Periscope rises to challenge Meerkat

Meerkat, the most popular app at SXSW 2015, uses Twitter to stream live videos. On Thursday, Twitter launched its own competitor, Periscope. How do the two apps compare?

Deborah Cannon/AP
Actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus, right, uses Meerkat to stream an interview with Marie Claire Editor in Chief Anne Fulenwider at South by Southwest 2015.

The most popular app at the 2015 South by Southwest (SXSW) Festival was small and simple. Meerkat, which launched only a few weeks prior to the festival, allows users to set up ad-hoc live video streams, which they can advertise to their Twitter followers.

Tap a button to begin recording, and everything a smart phone’s camera can capture is sent live to those followers who choose to tune in.

The app was immediately popular. Several reporters used it to stream Apple’s “Spring Forward” event, at which the Apple Watch was launched, to their Twitter followers. Tony Hawk used it to show his followers Icelandic views. Jimmy Fallon used it to share behind-the-scenes glimpses of his late-night talk show.

But just as Meerkat was gaining traction, Twitter announced that it had purchased a competing live-streaming app. Following the announcement, Twitter made things difficult for Meerkat by hindering its ability to notify people when a live stream was taking place. Users can still use Meerkat to distribute videos on Twitter, but they can’t push a notification to their followers to alert them to a live stream.

Twitter’s competing app, Periscope, launched on Thursday on the iOS App Store. Neither Periscope nor Meerkat has an Android app, though both are presumably coming soon. Periscope performs exactly the same function as Meerkat, but with some additions – such as the ability to view replays of live streams – baked in. (Meerkat doesn’t have that feature yet; once a stream is over, the video can’t be rewatched.) Both apps allow watchers to tap on the screen to indicate their appreciation for what they’re watching, and Periscope allows viewers to comment on the video in real time.

Without the ability to push Twitter notifications, it might seem that Meerkat is in a tough spot. But the company announced on Thursday that it had raised $14 million in funding from Silicon Valley investors and other venture capitalists. That money will allow it to improve its app and hopefully find a new way to let users know when live streams are happening.

Why the sudden widespread interest in mobile live streaming? It’s mostly to do with the fact that it wasn’t feasible until very recently. Not many people had smart phones powerful enough to stream live video, and data networks weren’t fast or widespread enough to allow users to send videos to the cloud. But now live streaming is starting to catch on, and Meerkat and Periscope are leading the charge.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.