Comcast and Apple said to be exploring video partnership

Reports say that Comcast and Apple are teaming up, which makes sense – increasingly, streaming is where the money is. 

Reuters
Apple and Comcast could introduce a streaming video platform to compete with Netflix.

Apple and Comcast are discussing the possibility of creating a Netflix-like streaming video service, according to the Wall Street Journal. 

The Journal, citing "people familiar with the matter," reports that the platform would utilize a set-top box and rely on Comcast's network, "to ensure it bypasses congestion on the Web." That congestion is purportedly at the root of a spat between Netflix, a heavy user of Internet bandwidth, and Verizon, which must maintain the infrastructure necessarily to support all of that streaming video. 

"Apple would benefit from a cable-company partner because it wants the new TV service's traffic to be separated from public Internet traffic over the 'last mile' – the portion of a cable operator's pipes that connect to customers' homes, the people familiar with the matter say," the Journal reports. "That stretch of the Internet tends to get clogged when too many users in a region try to access too much bandwidth at the same time."

Neither Apple nor Comcast has commented on the rumors. But Wall Street is treating them as real enough: Shares in Netflix slumped significantly in trading on Monday. 

Streaming video is a big business in the US. As the analytics firm SNL Kagan recently noted, traditional TV providers lost more than a quarter million subscribers last year – apparently the first full-year plunge in cable's history. Meanwhile, the number of consumers paying for streaming video continues to grow. 

Netflix, for instance, has more than 30 million consumers in the US. And Amazon has launched its own streaming video service; the company is also apparently in the process of building its own dongle that makes it easy to stream Amazon content on television sets. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.