Blackberry's down (way down) but not quite out

Blackberry posted massive losses in Q3, but interim CEO John Chen is betting it all to keep the Canadian tech company from hitting bottom.

AP
New: The iPhone-like Z10 has been selling well recently. BlackBerry’s market share had fallen from 41 percent to 5.

On Friday, Blackberry dropped the bomb that everyone knew was coming, but were waiting for the extent of the damage. It seems the Canadian company cannot catch a break.

In the third quarter of 2013, Blackberry posted a $4.4 billion loss, which includes a write-down on the current inventory of $1.6 billion. In terms of sales, this quarter only yielded $1.2 billion in revenue, down 24 percent from last quarter, and 40 percent of that revenue came from the 1.9 million smart phones sold, down from 3.7 million last quarter.

Though things seem pretty dire for the tech company that ushered in the era of BBM’s and still counts POTUS as a customer (the President uses Blackberry for security reasons, but has expressed desire to switch to the iPhone), the company is not down and out yet. Along with the sales loss announcement, Blackberry laid out its plans to bounce back.

The most prevalent plan is a five-year deal with electronics manufacturer Foxconn. The plan would relinquish much of Blackberry’s inventory control to Foxconn. “Essentially, it sounds much more like BlackBerry is making Foxconn a licensee with more or less full control over its smartphone division, while it continues to work on services and software in-house,” writes Darrell Etherington of TechCrunch. “It could be a good way to offload the risk and responsibility of handset production while still selling to its remaining market strongholds.”

In a statement, Blackberry interim CEO John Chen says recent leadership shuffling and an increased focus on software and social media over devices will be key to turning the company around. The smart phone side of Blackberry won’t be going away however – Mr. Chen says the focus will now be capturing emerging markets such as “Indonesia and other fast-growing markets in early 2014.”

Let’s back up for a second – how did Blackberry get here? In 2009, it was named one of the fastest growing companies.

Time’s Sam Gustin says that Blackberry’s biggest failure was not their device, but that they didn’t anticipate that smart phone growth would stem from consumers – not business people.

“BlackBerry was completely blindsided by the emergence of the 'app economy,' which drove massive adoption of iPhone and Android-based devices,” he writes. “BlackBerry failed to learn that smartphones would evolve beyond mere communication devices to become full-fledged mobile entertainment hubs.”

Chen has an uphill battle ahead of him, but a massive shake up may be exactly what Blackberry needs after reporting massive losses.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.