In win for Apple, US ban on a handful of Samsung products is upheld

The ban only involves older Samsung products, such as the Galaxy S II. 

Reuters
A Samsung employee holds a mobile phone at a Samsung display store in Johannesburg, on Oct. 3, 2013.

Samsung has lost the latest round in its ongoing battle with Apple

Yesterday, US Trade Representative Michael Froman declined to overturn a ban – originally put in place by the International Trade Commission – on a range of older Samsung devices, including the Galaxy S II and the dual-screen Continuum

"After carefully weighing policy considerations, including the impact on consumers and competition, advice from agencies and information from interested parties, I have decided to allow the commission's determination to become final," Froman says in a statement.

The development is a win for Apple, which filed the patent-infringement lawsuit that led to the ban. (The four patents in question involve touch-screen and headphone-detection technology, among other features.) 

And yet the repercussions for Samsung could be relatively limited: As Reuters notes, neither the ITC nor the US Customs and Border Protection have discussed exactly how they would keep affected Samsung products out of the States. 

Moreover, popular new items such as the Samsung Galaxy S4, which does not use banned technology, are exempt from the ruling. 

"We are disappointed by the US Trade Representative's decision to allow the exclusion order issued by the US International Trade Commission," Samsung says in a statement obtained by The Verge. "It will serve only to reduce competition and limit choice for the American consumer." 

In related news, Samsung today took the wraps off a new curved screen smartphone – allegedly the first in history – called the Samsung Galaxy Round. Unfortunately for American consumers, the device will launch initially only in Korea. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.