Samsung has sold 40 million Note phablets in two years: report

Meanwhile, the company has launched its latest phablet, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3.

Reuters
People gather in front of an ad during the launch of the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and Galaxy Gear in Jakarta, September 26, 2013.

Phablets have been slow to catch on in the US and Europe. But in developing markets, they're huge – by one estimate, more than 25 million phablets shipped to customers in the Asia-Pacific region in the first quarter of 2012 alone. (That number does not include Japan.)

In an interview with the Guardian earlier this month, analyst Joshua Flood of ABI Research speculated that the strong numbers could be attributed to a growing realization on the part of consumers "that a nearly 5-inch screen isn't such a cumbersome device." 

The latest evidence of the phablet craze comes from the tech site FocusTaiwan, which reports (hat tip to Mashable) that Samsung has sold 40 million Note devices over the past two years. The first device in Samsung's phablet line debuted in 2011; the most recent Note, the Note 3, hit shelves in several countries earlier this month. A North America launch will follow in early October. 

The Note 3 has received strong marks from critics. 

"To use a term of phrase borrowed from that other mobile giant, this is Samsung's best Note yet," Engadget wrote this week. "It's better in pretty much every way, with the possible exception of that speaker. The display is bigger, but it never makes the device feel inflated, which is some sort of dark magic in its own right. Either way, we applaud Samsung for consistently making this series better and better." 

Samsung, which helped establish the phablet vertical, has long been its dominant force. But that may not last. As analytics firm IDC recently pointed out, Samsung's share of the phablet market has shrunk from 90 percent in 2011 to 50 percent today. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.