Apple OS X Mavericks reportedly set for late October launch

Apple OS X Mavericks marks a departure from the cat-themed operating systems of yore. 

Apple
OS X Mavericks is shown on an Apple MacBook laptop.

Back in June, Apple took the wraps off a new desktop OS called Mavericks, but stopped short of specifying an actual launch date, saying only that the software would arrive this fall. 

Today comes news, courtesy of 9 to 5 Mac, that the official OS X Mavericks launch is scheduled for late October, after the release of iOS 7, Apple's new mobile operating system. 

"For the launch of both OS X Lion and OS X Mountain Lion, Apple released the new operating systems the day following an earning results release," writes Mark Gurman of 9 to 5 Mac. "Apple traditionally shares its Q4 earnings numbers during the second half of October, so perhaps Apple will release Mavericks the day following its Q4 results announcement." 

Standard caveats apply: Mr. Gurman attributes to his report to "sources with knowledge of the launch plans," and Apple isn't commenting. Still, Gurman has a pretty solid track record with Apple rumors, and it makes sense that Apple would want to release the new desktop OS separately from iOS 7, which will likely be shown off in conjunction with the next iPhone (probably the iPhone 5S, if you're keeping track). 

For all the previous versions of OS X, save the beta, which was called "Kodiak," Apple used big cat names – "Cheetah"; "Lion"; "Tiger," etc. But Cupertino apparently ran out of mammalian monikers. "We don’t want to be the first development team to be delayed by the lack of big cats," Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering Craig Federighi told TechCrunch. 

The next few iterations of the software will be named after locations in California. Mavericks, for instance, is a popular surfing spot in the north of the state. 

For more on what's inside OS X Mavericks, check out the Monitor's report from earlier this year. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.