A 13-inch iPad? Report says Apple may supersize its tablet line.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Apple is testing larger versions of the iPhone and iPad. 

Reuters
A man talks on his telephone as customers walk through an Apple store in Grand Central Terminal in New York, in this March 15, 2013 file photo.

Apple is experimenting with larger screens for the iPad and the iPhone, according to a new report in the Wall Street Journal. 

How big, exactly? Well, 13-inches in the case of the prototype iPad, and "larger than 4 inches" in the case of the prototype iPhone handsets.

For comparison's sake, the display on the current model iPad measures 9.7 inches from top right corner to bottom left. (The iPad Mini screen is smaller, at 7.9 inches.) Meanwhile, the iPhone 5, which was released last fall, is equipped with a 4-inch display – up from the 3.5 inch screen on the previous model iPhone. 

The usual rumor mill caveats apply here: Apple isn't commenting on the Journal report, and the newspaper is sourcing the whole thing only to anonymous "officials at the company's suppliers." Still, it makes sense. Here's why: Despite Steve Job's contention that the 3.5-inch display was the "perfect" size, smart phone screens are getting larger, from Apple's own devices to the popular Samsung Galaxy S3 and S4 lines (to say nothing of "phablets"). 

It makes sense that Apple would want to test out a plus-sized smart phone, even if the prototype never makes it to production. 

As for the larger iPad, we doubt that Apple will get rid of the 9.7-inch model. But just like the Cupertino company offered a smaller version of its tablet in the form of the iPad Mini (tagline: "every inch an iPad"), it's possible that it could eventually offer a larger version, too. 

Of course, it's worth noting that a 13-inch display would make for a pretty large tablet – one that would be harder to fit into handbags and backpacks. Consider the fact that when Toshiba unveiled a 13-inch tablet last year, Mashable called the device "monstrous." 

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.