Microsoft: Facebook Home is cool. But a lot of those ideas are ours.

Facebook Home, a new suite of Android apps, was unveiled at a big press event yesterday. And one Microsoft exec is saying that we've seen it before. 

Reuters
Yesterday, Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's co-founder and CEO, introduced Home, a Facebook app suite that integrates with Android. But according to a Microsoft exec, Home was more or less already invented – by Microsoft.

Yesterday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the stage at a press event in Menlo Park, Calif., and introduced a suite of Android apps called Home. Home is a far cry from that long-prophesied Facebook phone, but it does make Android handsets a whole lot more... Facebookier.

That's good news for Facebook, which wants all the eyeballs it can get, and good news for those extreme Facebook users who do not like to be separated from Facebook, ever. 

But not everyone shares in the Facebook Home glee. In a post today at the official Microsoft blog, Frank X. Shaw, a communications exec at the Redmond giant, noted that Facebook Home would be pretty cool, if the concept hadn't already been invented by Microsoft. 

"I tuned into the coverage of the Facebook Home event yesterday and actually had to check my calendar a few times," Shaw writes. "Not to see if it was still April Fools Day, but to see if it was somehow still 2011. Because the content of the presentation was remarkably similar to the launch event we did for Windows Phone two years ago."

The basic gist of the post is this: the Windows Phone development team pioneered much of what Zuckerberg says is pivotal to the Facebook Home platform. For example, Facebook Home includes something called Chat Heads, which combines various types of messages – IMs, SMS texts, and Facebook messages – into a single stream. That feature, Shaw notes, is already available on Windows Phone devices. 

Shaw then goes on to take a few shots at Android, a mobile OS that has been criticized for being too abstruse. 

"[A]s Android owners know, that platform is complicated enough without adding another skin built around another metaphor, on top of what is already a custom variant of the OS," Shaw continues, "So, while we applaud Facebook for working to give some Android owners a taste of what a 'people-centric' phone can be like, we’d humbly like to suggest that you get the real thing, and simply upgrade to a Windows Phone."

So, yes, maybe sour grapes. But as Farhad Manjoo notes in a smart piece over at Slate, Microsoft shouldn't be the only one to be worried – Facebook Home may also adversely affect Apple, too. 

"If I were [Apple CEO] Tim Cook," Manjoo writes, "I’d be especially worried that Facebook might solve one of Android’s biggest problems – its 'fragmented' ecosystem, in which every Android phone looks and works a little differently (and usually, not very well). This has long been a chief selling point for Apple: If you learn to use an iPhone once, you’ve learned to use it forever – all other models will always work more or less the same way. Now Facebook could ruin that advantage." 

For more tech news, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.