Websites go dark: Moment of silence honors Sandy Hook victims

Websites go dark one week after the shooting in Newtown, Conn. A group of tech leaders and celebrities interested in tightening gun laws organized for the websites go to dark at 9:30 a.m.

webmomentofsilence.org
A demonstration image shows what Yahoo.com would look like with the "moment of silence" banner in place. Many sites participated in a brief blackout on Friday morning to honor victims of the Sandy Hook shooting.

Dozens of websites briefly went dark at 9:30 Friday morning in a digital “moment of silence” to honor the victims of last week’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

The Huffington Post, Digg, Aol, and others displayed a simple banner in memory of those killed in the attack, and included a link to a Causes.com Web page outlining a campaign to reduce gun violence. By noon on Friday, nearly 200,000 people had signed the page’s pledge to “support gun violence prevention,” using the Twitter hashtags #momentforSandyHook and #NeverAgain to spread the message.

Many of the larger participating sites were invited to take part, but the moment of silence wasn’t an exclusive event. The associated page webmomentofsilence.org offered ready-made code that anyone could embed in their site to show a simple message over a darkened background. Webmomentofsilence.org also ran a complete list of the hundreds of sites that participated in the blackout.

While the online moment of silence was taking place, bells were ringing throughout Newtown to mark one week since the shooting. Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy stood with other officials on the steps of the Newtown town hall as the bell rang 26 times, once for each person killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Similar commemorations took place across the country, in spite of the rainy weather in many areas.

The online moment of silence was conceived by Ron Conway, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, as part of a campaign supporting gun control legislation. Conway’s name appears at the top of the corresponding Causes.com page, which also has support from other celebrities and big names in tech, including Britney Spears, Sean Parker, and Arnold Schwartzenegger. The group also ran a full-page ad in The New York Times on Wednesday, calling for stronger gun control.

This isn’t the first time major sites have gone dark to support a cause: earlier this year, Wikipedia, Reddit, and other major tech sites participated in a large (and successful) protest against the Stop Online Piracy Act, a bill aimed at enforcing copyright laws by requiring Internet service providers to block access to infringing websites. Wikipedia went black for a full day from January 18-19, asking visitors to “imagine a world without free knowledge.” Other major sites, including Google, also went dark or put up banners protesting SOPA’s regulatory provisions. The bill was indefinitely postponed shortly afterward.

For more tech news, follow Jeff on Twitter: @jeffwardbailey.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.