Could a huge magnet turn the Red Planet green?

Martian climate simulations suggest a relatively simple plan could restore Mars's ancient atmosphere, and more. 

In this artist concept, the MAVEN spacecraft approaches Mars on a mission to study its upper atmosphere in 2014.

With all the excitement over far-away exoplanets, it can be easy to overlook the other habitable-zone planet right in Earth's backyard. 

Despite its occasionally just-right temperature for surface water, we don’t often think of Mars as a thriving incubator, in no small part because our rusty neighbor lacks many of Earth’s comforts, including a life-giving atmosphere, mild temperatures, and a protective magnetic field.  

But if NASA’s Director of Planetary Science Jim Green and his team have their way, the Red Planet might someday look a little greener. Taking the stage at the Planetary Science Vision 2050 Workshop, Dr. Green outlined a new way of thinking about how to make Mars a little more like home by bringing back a life-supporting atmosphere and temperatures with an artificial version of the planet's lost magnetic field.

The plan is to plop a giant magnet at one of the spots where the gravitational pulls from the sun and Mars balance in such a way that a "parking" spot arises, allowing it to stay put relative to the sun and Mars. If the magnet were strong enough, the team’s simulations predict it could block the “wind” of charged particles that stream out from the sun, which the NASA's MAVEN orbiter has determined is blowing away what remains of the Martian atmosphere at about two pounds per second. Such a move could let Mars’s natural gas emissions slowly rebuild its ancestral atmosphere, aiding any future efforts to “terraform” the planet to make its environment more Earthlike.

“Mars is an arid and cold world,” the team writes in the accompanying paper. While the average temperature hovers around a chilly 80 degrees F. below, some days can reach a balmy 70 degrees near the equator. Such temperatures could melt ice, but with an atmosphere well over a hundred times thinner than Earth’s, the water would boil off into space before it could be of much use to a thirsty Martian explorer.

But ancient Mars was a different story, a relatively lush atmosphere protecting a giant ocean covering as much as a third of the surface. “We now know Mars has lost between 80 percent and 90 percent of its atmosphere over its history,” said Green in a talk last Wednesday. He suggests applying a modern understanding of the sun and solar wind to Martian climate models could pave the way to a new understanding of how to terraform the Red Planet.  

“Are there things that we can do that can help mitigate some of these extremes on Mars and provide a better environment for science and exploration to coexist on the surface?” he asked.

That’s where the magnet comes in. According to his team’s simulations, placing an Earthlike magnetosphere between Mars and the sun could produce some “pretty good” shielding from the solar wind, whose energy breaks up molecules in the atmosphere and blows the lighter bits off into space. Specifically, they predict total stripping could drop by a factor of ten, facilitating an eventual recovery.

A greatly enhanced atmosphere would afford humanity numerous benefits, including the ability to take advantage of “air braking” to land larger spaceships on the surface, a shield against most cosmic and solar particle radiation, and the possibility of “open air” greenhouses for plant production, the team writes.

It could even mean a partial return of the ancient ocean, one seventh of which remains on the planet, locked up at the poles. Various schemes, from orbital sun focusing mirrors to nuclear bombs, aim to melt the polar ice caps, and for good reason. Along with all that ice sits an even more valuable terraforming material, frozen carbon dioxide.

While rising CO2 levels threaten to make life more difficult on our planet, they’d be a boon for Martian settlers. “We as a species have learned how to make a planet hotter, and it would not take a lot to sublimate the CO2 in the polar caps (perhaps 4 degrees [of warming]). Once you do that the atmosphere would have a positive feedback due to the CO2 and get even hotter,” writes Luther Beegle, head of an organics-searching experiment on NASA’s 2020 Mars rover, in an email to The Christian Science Monitor.

As the CO2 joined the magnetically swaddled infant atmosphere, warmer weather could someday start to restore that ancient ocean. “You could conceivably get up to the point where the water would melt. The temperature on Mars does get above zero occasionally, so you would get more and more times like that,” Dr. Beegle says.

But scientists suspect it wouldn’t happen overnight. “At current loss rates driven by the sun and solar wind as measured by MAVEN, it would take about 2 billion years to remove the present atmosphere…. If we put up an artificial magnetosphere, it would be very intriguing in terms of physics.  But it would have minimal effect on the thickness of the atmosphere, the global temperature, or the behavior of the polar caps. At least not for billions of years,” says Bruce Jakosky, principal investigator of the MAVEN mission.

Even if scientists could accelerate the timescale, future settlers won’t be going for evening strolls on the gains of this plan alone. The magnetic shielding may be able to thicken the atmosphere and start to melt the ice caps, but it wouldn’t introduce any breathable oxygen into the primarily CO2 mix.

Still, it’d be a good start. Beegle, who calls the proposal “technically feasible, if you wanted to terraform the surface and were willing to spend large sums of money to do so,” points out that a lack of breathable air and comfortable temperatures don’t stop people from summiting Everest. Even without space suits.

But he has other objections. Green suggests a thicker, warmer atmosphere would smooth human endeavors on Mars, including scientific exploration, but Beegle isn’t so sure. With the exception of a few rovers, Mars’s pristine environment remains mostly untarnished, but if we start tinkering with the planet’s climate, it might not stay that way.

“As soon as we start mucking around with the surface, we change things perhaps to the point where it would be impossible to determine if life ever started on Mars. When we first send humans we are going to contaminate the site that they land at, because humans bring a ton of microbiology with them. If we also start heating the atmosphere, it would result in unpredictable consequences.”

Those who think a future on Mars is essential to the survival of the human race might not lose much sleep over a few microbes, but if delaying a centuries- (or billions of years) long plan a couple decades threatens the whole undertaking, we might not have much of a shot in the first place. 

After all, turning Mars from red to green is a colossal task, prompting some to wonder why it’s sometimes pitched as a Plan B to keeping the Earth green.

As Neil Degrasse Tyson told The Guardian: “If you had the power of geoengineering to terraform Mars into Earth, then you have the power of geoengineering to turn Earth back into Earth.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Could a huge magnet turn the Red Planet green?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today