Rare red-legged frog could be making a comeback

Egg masses discovered in the Santa Monica Mountains suggest that the threatened species made famous in a Mark Twain story is now sustaining itself without human help.

National Park Service/AP
A pair of California red-legged frogs (Rana draytonii) were found in the Santa Monica Mountains near Los Angeles, March 14, 2017.

In 2014, biologists moved 350 California red-legged frog eggs to a stream in the Santa Monica Mountains where they hadn’t been seen in decades.

One member of the team, wildlife ecologist Katy Delaney, said they were “cautiously optimistic” about their effort to bring the once-widespread frog back to the mountains. “I’d love it if in a few years we had red-legged frogs galore,” she told the Los Angeles Times in late 2013.

Now, that goal is becoming reality. On March 14, researchers found nine red-legged frog egg masses – probably laid by the frogs who were re-introduced as eggs four years ago. The find is an early sign that the restoration effort is working, and that the Santa Monica Mountains ecosystem is headed to greater health.

"I was literally crying when the stream team showed me the photos of egg masses," Dr. Delaney, who works with the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, told the Associated Press. "The years of work we've put in is showing amazing progress. There's still plenty of work to be done, but this is a major moment for the project."

It’s not just amphibian lovers who have a stake in the project’s success. Each year, tourism to the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area generates $26 million in economic impact for Southern California – and that’s not even counting the “ecosystem services,” like water filtration and flood control, that the area’s plants, animals, and soil provide.

Protecting delicate environments like these involves maintaining a proper balance of predators, prey, and other species. As biologist Anthony Barnosky explained to The Christian Science Monitor’s Eva Botkin-Kowacki recently, "Maybe you want to build that ecosystem into something that is functioning more or less naturally so that you don't have to constantly manage it."

"If you're thinking about building an ecosystem, it's kind of like thinking about building a house," he said. "You need a certain number of carpenters, a certain number of plumbers, a certain number of electricians."

Continuing with the house metaphor, frogs serve as an ecosystem’s smoke detectors and carbon-monoxide alarms. Exposed to both air and water, they’re considered important gauges of area’s overall health.

And in the Santa Monica Mountains, the red-legged frog has mostly shown a downward trend. Once prominent enough to figure in an 1865 short story by Mark Twain, they were gradually winnowed down by invasive species, habitat destruction, and pesticide use. By 1999, Los Angeles County only had three known populations remaining.

By the early 2010s, the frog’s absence hadn’t yet made itself felt in the rest of the NPS-administered recreation area. Joseph Serna reported for the Los Angeles Times in 2013 that “The red-legged frog is the only species missing from the park’s ecosystem.” The researchers decided that transplanting eggs from the nearby Simi Hills population was a step worth taking.

Those frogs’ hatching, maturing, and, now, breeding is one of a few glimmers of hope in the global amphibian picture. In recent months, scientists have re-discovered a long-lost frog species in Zimbabwe and found several “miniature” frog species in India.

Both in those places and in California, further conservation work remains. The researchers deliberately introduced the frogs to a stream free of invasive catfish, where they stood the best chance of surviving. But Delany sees this new generation as progress worth preserving.

“I’m really happy for every single milestone, but this is sort of the one we’ve been looking for.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.