How a new space weather forecaster could help protect astronauts

A new study finds that Earth-bound telescopes can more quickly detect the arrival of potentially hazardous particles from the sun than ones in orbit, adding extra time to protect spacefarers.

SDO/NASA/Reuters
This picture shows coronal mass ejection as viewed by the Solar Dynamics Observatory in June 2011.

Solar storms often roil the surface of Earth’s star, but their effects are rarely limited to that body alone; rather, they can send deep punches of energy blazing out into space.

Of these, the most powerful is known as a coronal mass ejection (CME), millions of tons – even a billion – of protons and electrons hurtling from the sun. While Earth’s atmosphere and magnetic field offer protection from the most dangerous effects of these and other forms of space weather, astronauts out in space are more vulnerable.

It is for this reason that a newly developed technique promising earlier warning of these solar events could provide such a critical contribution to future space travel.

“Robotic spacecraft are usually radiation-hardened to protect against these kinds of events,” said Chris St. Cyr, a space scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, in a press release. “But humans are still susceptible.”

Most space-weather research is done using space-based satellites, a big advantage of which is the absence of interruption by cloud cover. Aside from this limitation, however, ground-based instruments are able to offer a much higher time resolution than their space-bound colleagues – and they have the added benefit of being able to return data almost instantly.

Given that solar energetic particles, which are associated with CMEs, move so quickly, anything that can be done to shave time off the transmission and analysis of data is vital.

“With space-based coronagraphs, we get images back every 20-30 minutes,” said Sr. St. Cyr, who was also the study’s lead author. “You’ll see the CME in one frame, and by the time you get the next frame – which contains the information we need to tell how fast it’s moving – the energetic particles have already arrived.”

A coronagraph works by blocking out the bright face of the sun, thereby allowing observation of the wispy tendrils that surround it, the corona. In the latest research, astronomers using K-Cor, a coronagraph that perches atop Hawaii’s Mauna Loa volcano, were able to show that the information needed to predict the energy particles’ arrival was available about 45 minutes before they slammed into the Earth, tens of minutes before they even left the sun’s inner atmosphere.

The idea, assuming that repetitions of this study yield similar conclusions, is to couple the new technique with faster transfer of images online, providing a near real-time picture of space weather, similar to the service provided by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association for Earth’s own weather. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.