Mars may have supported life for hundreds of millions of years

Mars had complex chemical reactions of the kind that support life on Earth, NASA reports, and this window of habitability might have been open for tens, even hundreds of millions of years.

NASA/AP
NASA's Curiosity rover took this image of rocky ground on the lower flank of Mount Sharp on Dec. 2, 2016.

NASA's Mars rover, Curiosity, has become something of an expert on the red planet's Gale Crater since it first landed there in August 2012.

During that time, the probe has explored layer upon layer of rock in search of information about the microbe habitability of the area over time. According to scientists on the project, the mix of minerals suggests a great deal of changes and fluctuations in the area of the crater in the past, but it now seems that none of those changes would have been enough to preclude the development of life there.

In fact, the window of habitability on Mars – at least in the Gale Crater region – may extend tens or even hundreds of millions of years, scientists say. Evidence of water flow and dynamic geological processes point to an area where life could have indeed existed, though direct evidence of that life is still lacking. Yet Curiosity's recent discoveries of new minerals suggest water flow and chemical conditions that would support life on Earth.

As the NASA rover climbs uphill, away from older geological layers into newer rock, the composition of the minerals beneath its wheels has changed again. Hematite, boron, and clay minerals have become more abundant as Curiosity moves upward, indicating a wet environment on the surface that deposited sediments into the Martian soil over time.

"A sedimentary basin such as this is a chemical reactor," explained John Grotzinger, a member of the Curiosity team, in a statement. "Elements get rearranged. New minerals form and old ones dissolve. Electrons get redistributed. On Earth, these reactions support life."

Curiosity is currently ascending Mount Sharp, a large sediment deposit rising from the floor of the crater. The rover is in an area known as the Murray Formation, 656 feet above the crater floor where Curiosity landed four years ago.

As Curiosity climbs from one mineral layer to another on Mount Sharp, scientists are documenting the chemistry and inferring what the environment was like when these materials were deposited or altered. The abundance of hematite (Fe2O3) at higher levels, taking over from less-oxidized magnetite (Fe3O4), for example, has led Curiosity scientists to conclude that the atmosphere might have been warmer during that geological timeframe, or at least that there was increased reaction between the sediments and the Martian atmosphere.

"It turns out that this Murray Formation is really sort of a bonanza of all the things we intended to study when we picked the landing site," Dr. Grotzinger told Reuters. "We see all of the properties in place that we like to associate with habitability. There's actually nothing really extreme here, for the most part, so this is all very good for habitability over very long periods of time."

But will Curiosity last long enough to reach the top of Mount Sharp? Even as it makes these new discoveries, the aging rover is experiencing some technical problems. Curiosity's drill, which lets the other instruments probe beyond the rusted exterior of rocks, currently has a malfunctioning motor. The engineering team thought they had solved the problem after it was first noticed a week ago, but it has cropped up again, putting all drilling on hold for troubleshooting.

While the rover's original mission ended after two years, scientists hope to continue renewing the mission indefinitely – as long as Curiosity remains viable.

In the meantime, scientists are extracting as much information as they can from Curiosity's latest batch of geological data.

"The more complicated the chemistry is, the better it is for habitability," Grotzinger said. "The boron, hematite, and clay minerals underline the mobility of elements and electrons, and that is good for life."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.