Why the new James Webb telescope folds like origami

Final ground tests are being performed on the James Webb telescope, which will need to fold like origami in order to launch.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
NASA workers are lifted alongside the James Webb Space Telescope Mirror during its media reveal at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center at Greenbelt, Md., on November 2, 2016.

For years, the Hubble telescope has delivered us fantastic and otherworldly images of the universe. Now, with Hubble’s tenure in the skies running out, the approximately $9 billion James Webb telescope is set to take its place.

With a launch date set for October 2018, the James Webb telescope will soon introduce the world to next-generation images of outer space. But with next-generation imaging power comes next-generation engineering – and telescope scientists say that the James Webb telescope will be something to behold.

The telescope is slated to be an engineering marvel: in order to fit inside the rocket that will launch it into space, it must fold up completely. The infrared telescope also features a folding shield to protect the vulnerable lens from the sun’s heat, since infrared telescopes must remain cold to work properly.

"That's like a big umbrella – beach umbrella – so, we keep that facing the sun and the Earth so it dissipates all the heat through all the layers," astrophysicist and systems engineer Begona Vila told NPR. "That allows all the instruments to cool to the temperatures that we need."

Approximately the size of a tennis court, the James Webb telescope’s sunshield must squeeze into a much smaller package. Other parts must be carefully engineered to fit into a compact space, as well.

NASA plans to launch the telescope from the European Spaceport near Kourou, French Guiana.

Over the course of the two weeks following launch, the telescope’s component parts will carefully unfurl and become functional, allowing astronomers to view some of the oldest stars and galaxies in the universe. The James Webb telescope will reach its final destination after approximately 30 days and one million miles of travel.

The Christian Science Monitor’s Zhai Yun Tan reported on the telescope’s progress earlier this month: 

While its predecessor is credited with unveiling important discoveries including the acceleration of the universe’s expansion, the JWST is expected to go even further by exploring the birthplaces of planets, stars, and first galaxies born after the Big Bang more than 13.5 billion years ago with its sensitive infrared cameras. These observations will not only help scientists understand the origins of the universe but at the same time, look for signs of life in other planets. 

"We'd like to know if another planet out there has enough water to have an ocean, and we think we can do that," Dr. Mather said on one of the project’s missions to explore the Alpha Centauri system, Popular Mechanics reports.

Although the project is designed to be groundbreaking, it has also long been a source of frustration at NASA. Despite going over budget and employing a massive crew of engineers and astronomers, the telescope project is behind schedule.

Failure at this point could be catastrophic, leaving the telescope useless.  

"Yes, I think that scares all of us," Vila told NPR. "We do as much testing as we can."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why the new James Webb telescope folds like origami
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today