NASA devises plan to keep astronauts free of biological contamination

Last year, more than 100 researchers convened at a three-day summit to identify the risks and possible solutions of biological contamination.

Dimitri Gerondidakis/NASA/AP/File
The OSIRIS-REx spacecraft sits inside a servicing facility at Kennedy Space Center in Florida in May 2016, after arriving from Lockheed Martin's facility near Denver. Its mission, which launched in September, aims to return a sample of the asteroid Bennu to Earth for study.

As crewed trips to Mars become increasingly feasible in terms of rocket technology, researchers are beginning to work out the minutiae of space travel. Where will astronauts live, work, and socialize on the six-month journey? How will they exercise? What will their kitchens look like?

And once they get to there, how will they avoid contamination?

Last year, more than 100 researchers convened at a three-day summit to identify the risks and explore possible solutions. For each of NASA’s robotic missions to other planets, the agency has implemented comprehensive protocols designed to minimize biological contamination: craft are scrubbed meticulously, and were once even baked before flight. But so far, there are no such requirements for human travel to the Red Planet.

“The benefit of having humans in space is that they're much more flexible than robots, but they could contaminate Mars with Earth life,” Catharine Conley, NASA's planetary protection officer, told

Contamination is a major concern for NASA and other space agencies, but not necessarily for the reasons you might expect. It's not so much about keeping Martian lifeforms from Earth – as far as we know, there are none – but about keeping Earth's microbes away from Mars. Scientists guess that most bacteria would be killed by the Red Planet’s harsh conditions, but that could take hundreds or even thousands of years.

In a worst-case scenario, those microbes could thrive. That would present a major problem for astrobiologists working on the planet. Finding evidence of past Martian life could become even more difficult if researchers have to comb through microbial hitchhikers. But there’s much we don’t know when it comes to preventing such contamination.

Researchers have identified 25 such knowledge gaps, organized into three basic categories: monitoring microbes and human health; investigating how contaminants might travel between Mars and Earth; and technology and strategies for controlling potential contamination.

“A really interesting development that came to light was all the work done in the biomedical community to investigate the human microbiome and environmental microbiome – what microbes live in people and their environments,” Dr. Conley said. “Ten years ago, the technology to analyze these microbiomes was not well-established, but now there are devices on the International Space Station with microbial monitoring capabilities.”

Now, researchers are considering new ways to collect and analyze microbes while limiting risks. Safe disinfectants are also just out of reach.

“[By closing knowledge gaps] we will be able to establish clear quantitative guidelines on planetary protection that will lead to eventual international consensus standards for human missions beyond Earth orbit and particularly in support of a collaborative journey to Mars,” Gerhard Kminek, the planetary protection officer of the ESA, said in a statement.

It may seem a bit preemptive to consider things like contamination before a Mars spacecraft is even finished, but many of the smaller-scale challenges of interplanetary travel can be solved now.

On the Hawaiian volcano Mauna Loa, for example, astronauts have endured year-long isolation missions as part of NASA’s HI-SEAS project. The mission was designed to test astronaut’s physical and psychological limits, as The Christian Science Monitor reported earlier this month:

Psychological research in prisons strongly suggests that solitary confinement can have a negative impact on decision-making and emotional health. The same is likely true in deep space: studies of crew members on the International Space Station have found that on prolonged space journeys isolation may have negative effects on astronaut performance.

“They get to miss the feeling of wind on their faces,” Gloria Leon, a University of Minnesota psychologist who advises NASA on astronaut selection, tells the Monitor in a phone interview. “They miss the smells of nature, or the smell of food cooking. On a Mars voyage, Earth will be out of view. It will be the equivalent of twilight, looking out of the porthole. So there will be boredom – monotony, really – in terms of the environment.”

Small comforts may also play a significant role in the physical and psychological well being of future space travelers – doubly true for the non-professionals who may fly with private companies such as Mars One or SpaceX. To this end, agencies have already developed building concepts for Martian dwellings, complete with exercise units and small indoor gardens. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to NASA devises plan to keep astronauts free of biological contamination
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today