Is this tiny transparent ocean animal wearing an invisibility cloak?

Near-invisibility can be hard to pull off, even underwater, but these crustaceans may have help from friendly bacteria.

Courtesy of Laura Bagge/Duke University
Phronima is a crustacean that lives in the twilight zone of the ocean, where there is nowhere to hide from predators. In addition to being nearly transparent, a new study has found that she and other midwater crustaceans carry an anti-reflective optical coating that may be made of living bacteria. At top left is the hollowed out shell of her prey, the salp, which becomes a floating nest to raise her babies, one of which is below her tail.
Courtesy of Laura Bagge/Duke University
Photos from a scanning electron microscope show the brush-like array of light-absorbing structures on the leg of a midwater crustacean called Cystisoma at left, and the tiny spheres that perform the same function on the body of Phronima, another midwater crustacean. The spheres may be a colony of bacteria specific to Phronima.

Out in the open ocean there is no place to hide from a hungry predator. Marine animals must devise novel ways of going undetected in plain sight.

Being translucent, like most of the little crustaceans that belong to the suborder Hyperiidea, can help. Still, savvy predators can glimpse the tasty morsels floating around when light glints off of their bodies.

But the shrimp-like animals have a trick up their sleeves for just that scenario, according to new research published Thursday in the journal Current Biology. The crustaceans are covered in a thin antireflective layer, making the animal's bodies and legs as much as 250 times less reflective.

"These animals are famous for being hard to see" with their highly transparent bodies, Tom Cronin, a biologist at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County who was not part of the research, tells The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview. 

But even see-through, it's still difficult to be invisible, he says. And this study "shows that animals actually can address other aspects of invisibility, ones that are less obvious than just being transparent."

When Laura Bagge, a Ph.D. candidate at Duke University, and colleagues looked at seven species of Hyperiid amphipods under an electron microscope, they found that the crustaceans were covered in a film of tiny spheres that were all uniform in size. 

It's a lot like the technology used on anti-glare eyeglasses, Ms. Bagge explains in a phone interview with the Monitor. These small beads reduce the amount of light reflected off the surface, instead allowing more light to pass through it.

The result is anywhere from a fourfold to a 250-fold decrease in light reflected off the animal, according to modeling Bagge and her colleagues conducted in the lab. 

The researchers aren't sure exactly what those little spheres are made of. They aren't part of the animal's hard shell or any other part of the organism itself, Bagge says. "Our best guess is that it's actually living bacteria," she says. Those tiny bacteria presumably have some sort of symbiotic relationship with the crustaceans.

The nanosphere blanket wasn't all that Bagge and her colleagues found atop the small sea creatures. The largest of the seven species studied, Cystisoma, also has brush-like structures growing out of its legs. These structures actually grow out of the six-inch-long animal's exoskeleton and act in the same way as the antireflective beads blanketing the animals, disrupting reflection so light can more easily pass through the transparent animals.

"It's always amazing to see the various solutions animals have come up with to adapt best to their environment," Lydia Mäthger, a scientist in the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass., who was not part of the research, writes in an email to the Monitor.

Other animals have found other ways to camouflage their bodies in highly visible marine environments. For example, Dr. Mäthger says, cephalopods (squid, octopus, and cuttlefish) have structures that can scatter light in various ways or reflective structures that are angled to only be seen from one direction. And, she adds, cephalopods can also turn reflective mechanisms on and off, going from transparent to opaque, to become invisible to different types of predators. 

But, Mäthger says, "A reflection-reducing structure, such as reported here, is a fascinating new finding."

This newfound antireflection mechanism likely isn't just about protecting the animals from predation, Dr. Cronin points out. These animals are also aggressive predators in their own right and this sort of invisibility cloak might also help the crustaceans sneak up on jellyfish, salps, and other unsuspecting prey.

And just as the crustaceans have evolved to move around undetected, their predators must evolve ways to better detect them, Mäthger adds, "so what visual strategies might we expect from the predators that these amphipods are hiding from?"

These camouflage adaptations likely have driven unique visual adaptations in other animals too, she says.

Bagge and her colleagues still have many questions about the new structures. 

One lingering puzzle is whether or not those tiny spheres are actually bacteria as suspected. Animals are normally covered in many microbes, but they're not typically uniform in size like these spheres appear to be on the crustaceans. Furthermore, at about 50 nanometers, these beads are significantly tinier than any recorded bacteria.

"We don't have another hypothesis about what it could possibly be," Bagge says. Perhaps they are from another kingdom of microbes, Archaea, she says, or are little pieces of bacteria that have broken off. But for now, she says, "Bacteria is the best guess."

And if the researchers are right and it does turn out to be bacteria, Cronin says, "It's another view of how very different creatures can work together for mutual benefit."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.