What's a beardog? Extinct Chihuahua-sized animal yields clues.

An extinct family of carnivorans known as beardogs may have had humble beginnings in what is today southern North America, suggests a discovery in the archives of Chicago's  Field Museum.

Courtesy of Monica Jurik/The Field Museum
Artist's illustration of a Chihuahua-sized fossil "beardog."

To get his bearings as a new postdoctoral researcher at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago about three years ago, Susumu Tomiya began going through the museum's archive's drawers and cabinets. That's how he stumbled upon enigmatic jawbones that were about 37 million or 38 million years old.

"It was classified as a sort of a generic, very primitive carnivore," Dr. Tomiya tells The Christian Science Monitor. But "the classification of the animal seemed wrong."

During previous research, Tomiya had examined many carnivoran fossils from the same time period. "The teeth of the jaws reminded me of much larger and later animals, known as beardogs," he says.

So Dr. Tomiya and his colleague, Zhijie Jack Tseng, X-ray CT scanned the fossils to take a closer look. And they found that these little jaw bones were indeed from a Chihuahua-sized beardog. 

Their research, reported in a paper published Tuesday in the journal Royal Society Open Science, sheds light on the strange family known as the beardog, or Amphicyonidae.

Although the animals have been extinct for a few million years, "Beardogs represent a very successful group of carnivores that thrived in Europe, Asia, Africa, and North America," Xiaoming Wang, curator and chair of vertebrate paleontology at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles, who was not part of the research, writes in an email to the Monitor. "In their hey days, they were apex predators at various times."

And now a picture of the animal's origins is beginning to take shape.

Tomiya and Dr. Tseng realized the fossil they were looking at in the Chicago collection looked a lot like another fossil animal found at the same site in Texas. And upon examining both specimens, they realized they had the earliest known beardogs on their hands. 

"We knew very little about the origin of beardogs," Tomiya says. "We know their later history pretty well. But we didn't really know where they came from, both in terms of the geography of origin and in relation to other groups of carnivorans."

With both specimens being found in Texas, Tomiya and Tseng suspect beardogs may have first emerged in the southern part of North America – or at least that region was significant to their early evolutionary history.

The specimens were unearthed 70 years ago, but were first described just 30 years ago. Then, they  were identified as members of the genus Miacis. 

"By putting them in this genus called Miacis, there was an implicit statement that these animals were very primitive carnivores that were somehow related to the living dogs and cats, but we couldn't really tell exactly how," Tomiya says.

And this new research provides the additional evidence needed to clarify that evolutionary relationship, Dr. Wang says.

Tomiya and Tseng found the fossils to sit near the base of the Amphicydonidae lineage, which in turn sits within Caniformia, the family that includes dogs, bears, walruses, raccoons, and weasels. 

(Note: That is not to say beardogs are dogs, however, as Tomiya explains, "technically speaking the beardogs are neither bears nor dogs, and they are equally closely related to the dogs as weasels, seals, raccoons, and such." Although the later, more dominant members of the beardog group were quite large and did look remarkably like bears.)

The specimen at the Field Museum had previously been dubbed Miacis australis, so the pair renamed it Angelacrtocyon australis. The other specimen from the same rock formation in Texas had been called Miacis cognitus, but as it too proved to be an early beardog, Tomiya and Tseng renamed it Gustafsonia cognita.

Beardogs are entirely extinct: There are no known modern-day descendants of their lineage. But they witnessed the evolution of many members of the carnivoran families that still live today. Living alongside animals such as dogs, cats, and bears for some 40 million years, they could have competed with, and therefore helped shape the evolution of, these well-known predators, Tomiya suggests.

"We may have had rather different-looking dogs, bears, etc. had the beardogs not existed," he writes in a follow-up email to the Monitor. "We are only beginning to understand what exactly those impacts were (e.g., on the rates of diversification and extinction among co-evolving carnivoran groups), and such an inquiry requires researchers to keep improving the list of past biodiversity by uncovering relationships of extinct organisms as well as documenting new fossil discoveries."

As such, "it was quite fortuitous" to happen upon these early beardog bones already in the Field Museum collection, Tomiya says. And, he adds, it's an important reminder that museum collections are still a treasure-trove for new discoveries, even after having already been described in scientific papers. "The specimens we keep in museums keep enlightening us," he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.