Did Mars's crust contribute to its atmosphere?

According to a new study released by NASA scientists, xenon and krypton isotopes detected on Mars by the Curiosity rover could help scientists track changes to the planet's atmosphere over time.

A self-portrait of the Mars rover Curiosity is seen in this 2013 image courtesy of NASA.

Mars’s famously red surface is more than just a passive bystander to the dramatic changes that have occurred on the planet over time – instead, it likely influenced them, according to a new study by NASA researchers.

The study’s findings were made possible by the Curiosity rover’s information gathering Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) array of instruments, which measured the levels of the gases xenon and krypton in the Red Planet's atmosphere. By tracking those gases, scientists say, they can also track Mars’s atmospheric changes over time.

Scientists are particularly interested in the balance of different chemical variations – or isotopes – of the two gases. By studying the ratios of the different variants, the researchers are able to infer details about how different elements have interacted with each other in the past. And the emerging story suggests that chemical interactions on the surface of the planet have helped shaped the chemical composition of the atmosphere.

Scientists have focused on the presence of xenon and krypton in the Martian atmosphere since the Viking missions of decades past. Those measurements have served as benchmarks for researchers analyzing data gathered by Curiosity.

The Curiosity mission, however, has also been able to gather a different set of measurements for scientists – concentrations of isotopes of both elements. Xenon alone has nine different isotopes, and by tracing those isotopes, scientists can make assumptions about the planet’s history.

Tests showed that certain xenon and krypton isotopes were more abundant on the Red Planet than others, leading researchers to believe that they were released from rocks in the regolith layer, or layer of soil and rocks near the planet’s surface.

The process is thus: when cosmic rays hit the regolith, scientists believe that they kicked off a process called neutron capture, which occurs when neutrons transfer from one element to another.

On Mars, for example, barium atoms in the regolith may have transferred neutrons to nearby xenon atoms after being struck by cosmic rays, thereby forming xenon isotopes called xenon 124 and 126. A very similar process occurs when bromine loses neutrons to krypton, forming krypton isotopes.

"SAM's measurements provide evidence of a really interesting process in which the rock and unconsolidated material at the planet's surface have contributed to the xenon and krypton isotopic composition of the atmosphere in a dynamic way," said study lead author Pamela Conrad in a NASA press release.

Impacts on Mars’s surface would then release those noble gas isotopes into Mars’s atmosphere. By the time that Curiosity performed its tests, using a technique called static mass spectrometry, isotope ratios were different than scientists had expected, based on previous tests and their knowledge of the Red Planet.

"The unique capability to measure in situ the six and nine different isotopes of krypton and xenon allows scientists to delve into the complex interactions between the Martian atmosphere and crust," said Mars Exploration Program lead scientist Michael Meyer. "Discovering these interactions through time allows us to gain a greater understanding of planetary evolution."

This is not the first time that rock testing by Curiosity has led scientists to interesting conclusions about the Martian atmosphere. This summer, NASA reported that the rover had found oxygenated manganese on Mars, a discovery that scientists say is significant because it means that the planet might have had a more oxygen rich atmosphere than was previously thought.

“This tells us that Mars has evolved very differently than we thought it did,” Nina Lanza, a researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory told the Monitor in June. “We need to start looking for different types of minerals and other evidence about Mars’s past.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.