How an ancient skeleton may uncover secrets of the Antikythera shipwreck

The discovery of a skeleton in the famed Antikythera shipwreck may shed light on the origins of an ancient Greek mariner.

Courtesy of Brett Seymour/EUA/WHOI/ARGO
Archaeologists Brendan Foley, Theotokis Theodoulou and Alex Tourtas excavate the Antikythera Shipwreck skeletal remains, assisted by Nikolas Giannoulakis and Gemma Smith.

Nearly 2,100 years ago, a large ship sank off the Greek island of Antikythera in the Aegean Sea, leaving its cargo scattered across the seafloor. Today, underwater archaeologists have found human remains, well-preserved enough that scientists may be able to extract DNA.

If they're successful, this could yield insight into the lives of the people aboard the ship and their people.

"Archaeologists study the human past through the objects our ancestors created," said Brendan Foley, a marine archaeologist with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), in a press release. "With the Antikythera Shipwreck, we can now connect directly with this person who sailed and died aboard the Antikythera ship." 

The Antikythera Shipwreck was first discovered in 1900 by Greek sponge divers. With a bounty of artifacts, including a clockwork device, dubbed the 'Antikythera mechanism,' that has been called the first computer, the wreck has attracted significant attention.

When it was first discovered, the visible parts of the wreck were thoroughly picked over. But a team of archeologists led by WHOI scientists and researchers from the Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports returned to dig beneath potsherds and sand for more artifacts. 

Beneath about a foot and a half of debris lay a human skeleton. 

"We’re thrilled," Dr. Foley told Nature News. "We don’t know of anything else like it."

The archaeologists found a partial skull, three teeth, leg and arm bones, and pieces of rib. But most enticing was that both petrous bones – dense bones behind the ear that provide the best possibility of holding the seafarer's DNA – are among the bones. 

"If there's any DNA, then from what we know, it'll be there," Hannes Schroeder, a specialist in ancient-DNA analysis at the Natural History Museum of Denmark in Copenhagen who the team brought in to help with the analysis, told Nature News.

The team is holding off on their attempt of DNA extraction until permission is granted by the Greek authorities.

The remains are thought to be those of a young man. The bones are stained amber red by the corroded iron objects that surrounded them. This hints that perhaps the victim was a slave, unable to escape because of his chains. 

Scientists note that it is rare for skeletons to be found in shipwrecks, as victims are usually swept away, decay, or are eaten by marine animals. But, as this was a particularly large ship, the victims may have been trapped below decks when their ship sank.

DNA analysis could help sort out the victim's age and familial heritage and better paint a picture of the story of this ship's last voyage.

Laden with luxury items, the ship was probably traveling from Greece to Rome, say historians. DNA analysis could help confirm or challenge that story.

These aren't the first human remains to be discovered at the Antikythera shipwreck. French marine explorer Jacques Cousteau discovered bones scattered across the wreckage in 1976, thought to belong to at least four individuals. But at the time, ancient DNA analysis was not an option.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.