'Parrot lizard' used camouflage to avoid becoming lunch

Using fossilized skin, paleontologists revealed the color and markings of Psittacosaurus, a discovery that helped them determine its habitat as well. 

Jakob Vinther and Robert Nicholls/Reuters/Handout
An artist's illustration of Psittacosaurus, a little dinosaur with a parrot-like beak and bristles on its tail that roamed thick forests in China about 120 million years ago.

With doe eyes and a parrot-like beak, Psittacosaurus may have been the most adorable dinosaur of its day.

Thanks to a new reconstruction, the dinosaur is winning admirers today, after paleontologists used fossilized skin to put together a 3-D model. Psittacosaurus, whose name means “parrot lizard,” roamed China’s forests about 120 million years ago. The new model, published Thursday in the journal Cell Biology, reveals never-before-seen physical details.

“Our model suggests it was super, super cute,” lead author Jakob Vinther, a molecular paleobiologist at the University of Bristol, told Reuters. “I think they would have made fantastic pets. They look a bit like E.T.”

Psittacosaurus, which grew to be about five feet long, lived during the Cretaceous period in what is now China. Beaked and bristle-tailed, the herbivorous “parrot lizard” would have been a staple meal for large predators, such as T. Rex’s feathered cousin, Yutyrannus.

With hundreds of fossil specimen to work from, paleontologists have studied Psittacosaurus extensively. But certain aspects of this dinosaur’s appearance and lifestyle still eluded researchers. That is, until Dr. Vinther got his hands on one remarkably complete specimen.

Using electron microscopy, Vinther and colleagues identified fossilized organelles on the dinosaur’s skin. Intact melanosomes, which create and store pigment in vertebrate animals, revealed Psittacosaurus’s color and markings. Vinther enlisted the help of prominent paleoartist Robert Nicholls to bring the dinosaur to life.

“Our Psittacosaurus was reconstructed from the inside-out,” Mr. Nicholls said in a statement. “There are thousands of scales, all different shapes and sizes, and many of them are only partially pigmented. It was a painstaking process but we now have the best suggestion as to what this dinosaur really looked like.”

Psittacosaurus sported a dark brown body with a lighter underside – a pattern known as countershading. The dinosaur’s hind legs were striped on the inside, but spotted on the outside. Its face was heavily pigmented, likely for show.

The coloring on the rest of the body, however, was likely meant to help it hide in its surroundings. Based on the reconstruction, Vinther and colleagues were also able to infer Psittacosaurus’ habitat. The brownish coloration would have nicely concealed the creature in a forest environment, as opposed to a more open habitat. And given the dinosaur’s status as prey, camouflage would have been extremely useful; countershading could confuse predators, making Psittacosaurus appear flatter and harder to spot.

Countershading “is everywhere,” Vinther told Reuters. “We see it in the sea, on land and in flying birds. Examples could be penguins, puffins, dolphins, mackerel, deer, foxes, antelopes. You name it. It's ubiquitous.”

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Parrot lizard' used camouflage to avoid becoming lunch
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today