Geologists say that we are now living in the Age of Humans

Geologists recommend that a new geological epoch, characterized by profound human impact, be formally recognized.

NASA/Reuters
A photo of Earth taken by NASA's Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera. Geologists have recommended recognizing the period at which humanity became the predominant force over the Earth's environment as the Anthropocene epoch.

Has the “Age of Humans” begun?

In a presentation to the International Geological Congress in Cape Town, South Africa, members of the Working Group on the Anthropocene (WGA) recommended that a new geological epoch – the Anthropocene – be formally recognized. Humanity’s profound impact on Earth, they argue, should mark a new segment of geological time.

“The significance of the Anthropocene is that it sets a different trajectory for the Earth system, of which we of course are part,” Jan Zalasiewicz, a University of Leicester geologist and chair of WGA, told The Guardian.

Geologists estimate that the Anthropocene, which translates to “Age of Humans,” began between the late 1940s and early 1960s. At that point, industrialization and agriculture had already left a clear mark on atmosphere and soil conditions, and extinction rates for animals and plants were beginning to increase.

But it was the advent of nuclear weapons testing that finally ushered in the new epoch, WGA scientists say. Since then, humanity has become the number one force of planetary change – for better or worse.

The Anthropocene concept isn’t a new one. Nobel prize-winning chemist Paul J. Crutzen coined the term more than 16 years ago, although its usage may have originated in 1960s Soviet Russia. International committees on geological time have heard formalization proposals since as early as 2008.

But while the Anthropocene does hold scientific weight, some experts have argued that the term is most useful as a cultural concept.

“Since the planet is our life support system – we are essentially the crew of a largish spaceship – interference with its functioning at this level and on this scale is highly significant,” Chris Rapley, a climate scientist at University College London, told The Guardian. “If you or I were crew on a smaller spacecraft, it would be unthinkable to interfere with the systems that provide us with air, water, fodder and climate control. But the shift into the Anthropocene tells us that we are playing with fire, a potentially reckless mode of behaviour which we are likely to come to regret unless we get a grip on the situation.”

In other words, recognition of the new epoch could inspire more active changes in how we interact with Earth and its resources. But first, the name needs to be legitimized by the geological community.

WGA scientists will first have to pinpoint the “golden spike” – the exact point when humans transitioned from mere participants to global influencers. Among other methods, researchers will study boreholes in glacial ice, which show changes in atmospheric composition over time. The entire process could take three years or more.

Then, the group will present its final report to the International Commission on Stratigraphy. If the commission agrees to add the Anthropocene epoch to Earth’s official timeline, it must then be ratified by the executive committee of the International Union of Geological Sciences.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.