Using CT scanners to copy of every fish in the sea

Adam Summers at the University of Washington is making 3-D images of whole fish and uploading them to an open-access database for scientific research.

Adam Summers/University of Washington/AP
A scan of the Trianectes Maculatus species of fish, also known as the Hogchoker, provided by Adam Summers, a University of Washington professor in the department of Biology and the School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences. Summers is using a micro computed tomography, also known as "CT," scanner at a lab on Washington's San Juan Island as part of an ambitious project to scan and digitize more than 25,000 species in the world.

University of Washington biology professor Adam Summers no longer has to coax hospital staff to use their CT scanners so he can visualize the inner structures of stingray and other fish.

Last fall, he installed a small computed tomography, or CT, scanner at the UW's Friday Harbor Laboratories on San Juan Island in Washington state and launched an ambitious project to scan and digitize all of more than 25,000 species in the world.

The idea is to have one clearinghouse of CT scan data freely available to researchers anywhere to analyze the morphology, or structure, of particular species.

So far, he and others have digitized images of more than 500 species, from poachers to sculpins, from museum collections around the globe. He plans to add thousands more and has invited other scientists to use the CT scanner, or add their own scans to the open-access database.

"We have folks coming from all over the world to use this machine," said Summers, who advised Pixar on how fish move for its hit animated films "Finding Nemo" and "Finding Dory" and is dubbed "fabulous fish guy" on the credits for "Nemo."

He raised $340,000 to buy the CT scanner in November. Like those used in hospitals, the CT scanner takes X-ray images from various angles and combines them to create three-dimensional images of the fish.

With each CT scan he posted to the Open Science Framework, a sharing website, people would ask him, "What are you going to scan next?" He would respond: "I want to scan them all. I want to scan all fish."

Then he developed techniques, such as scanning multiple specimens, that made the goal within reach, he said, and suddenly a project that easily could have taken 50 years boiled down to just a few years.

"It wasn't just a joke anymore. We could actually say it and have a hope of actually getting every fish scanned," he said.

Scans typically cost $500 to $2,000 each, but Summers' project provides free access to scans. Summers recalled how as a graduate student 17 years ago he bribed a hospital technician with Snickers bars to scan large stingrays in its CT scanner.

At the time, he wanted to know how an animal with a skeleton composed of cartilage could do such "a crazy thing" as crush hard prey, such as snails and mussels. The medical CT scan helped offer an answer: the sting ray had mineralized tissue in its cartilage.

So began his fascination with CT scans as a way to uncover other puzzles: What's the structure of a sting ray's wing? How does one scale in armored fish overlap with another and what are the implications for movement?

"It's been a long road from getting them for free, paying some money for them, using hospital facilities in the middle of the night," Summers said.

The scanner, about the size of two dorm refrigerators, is housed at the UW's marine lab on Friday Harbor, 80 miles north of Seattle.

He is also known for his fish photographs – stunning images of fish that have been stained with red and blue dyes to highlight cartilage and bone – which were shown at the Seattle Aquarium.

The scanner can handle smaller fish; about two grapefruits stacked on top of each other. The average fish is about a foot long, so he said he can cover half the world's fish. He's hoping to scan large fish using industrial scanners elsewhere, including at the University of Washington.

Malorie Hayes, a graduate student at Auburn University, took Summers up on his offer to use the scanner after hearing him talk about the project at a recent conference. In two weeks, she'll fly to the lab to scan over 200 species of African barbs, a small freshwater fish.

Such fish are rare and difficult to obtain, she said. To look at their skeleton, you typically would have to destroy the specimen. CT scans offer a nondestructive way to study those bones. "Instead of having to cut them open, I can visualize the skeletons," she said. "There are lots of questions that can be answered just by looking at their skeletons."

Summers has been fascinated with how researchers are using the scans. Some are making computer graphics models and animating the fish. Another group colorized the skulls to show what bones were what.

"The reason this can happen is, it's free an open access," he said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to