How do songbirds learn their melodies? Scientists reveal clues.

A study published Tuesday is the first to identify how male zebra finches learn their father's song, which serves as the model for their own.

OIST
Juvenile, father, and mother zebra finches. A study published Tuesday is the first to identify how male zebra finches learn their father's song, which serves as the model for their own.

Human babies seem to have a natural knack for languages. Fluency in any of the world’s 6,500 languages comes within the first few years of life, without much apparent effort.

A recent study of how songbirds learn their melodies seeks to shine light on the cognitive processes through which young birds learn and imitate vocal communication – insights which could lead to a better understanding of the development of human speech, as well.

“A bird’s baby song is really immature. There’s no clear structure - it’s more like a baby babbling, but then it becomes structured, like the tutor song [as the bird gets older],” Yoko Yazaki-Sugiyama, co-author of the study published in Nature Communications Tuesday, tells The Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview.

The male zebra finch learns a complex song from his father, or tutor, in order to attract a female finch. Dr. Yazaki-Sugiyama, an assistant professor at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University in Japan, and Shin Yanagihara, a researcher at the same school, were the first to identify the neurons in zebra finches’ brains associated with the auditory memory of the father’s song.

The pair studied young zebra finches in the critical period of development, when brain circuits are considered very flexible, to examine the impact of auditory experiences, particularly listening to a tutor's song.

Zebra finches begin memorizing their tutor's song between 20 and 50 days after hatching. At first, they just listen and make crude vocalizations, but by 90 days old they develop their own distinctive song, based off their tutor’s song, according to a previous study from scientists at the University of Illinois, Urbana. 

The evolution from silence to babbling to a distinctive melody is apparently made possible by the experience of listening to the bird's father’s song to form a memory. Once the birds have the tutor's song memorized, they try to mimic it.

The researchers monitored the neuronal auditory response of both tutored and isolated birds listening to their own song, their tutor’s song, other zebra finches’ songs, and different songbirds’ songs. The study revealed that about 5 percent of the tutored bird’s neurons, or 27 neurons, responded exclusively to their tutor’s songs.

"In the normal, tutored birds, we encountered a group of neurons that responded very strongly to the tutor song, after they had learned the song, but did not respond to the other songs," Dr. Yanagihara said in a press release. "However, for the birds which had no tutor experiences, we did not see any response to the tutor-song, or in this case the genetic-father-song, and no selective neurons at all."

Scientists predict that the selective neurons that respond to the tutor’s song represent the part of the higher auditory cortex where early auditory memory is located in the brain.

"We believe that these tutor song selective neurons represent the memory of the tutor song and that learning the tutor song during the critical period changes the neural circuits to accommodate this memory," Yanagihara said.

Another finding was that the neurons of sleeping birds were less selective than those of awake birds, meaning they responded to other songs in addition to the tutor song.

As for the implications for human language, Yazaki-Sugiyama tells the Monitor that researchers believe that the human brain is also "wired" based on early sensory experiences. But the zebra finch song is much simpler than human speech: it’s a behavior to attract females, rather than a way to convey information. Additionally, each zebra finch has only one distinctive melody.

“Once they develop their own song, it doesn’t change. Each individual has their own specific song that makes them individual. They learn only one thing,” says Yazaki-Sugiyama.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.