Scientists investigate deer that sounds just like a Nazgûl

Scientists have been investigating the eerie shrieks of the wapiti, an animal that produces cries far higher than a creature of its bulk should be able to.

Kevork Djansezian/AP/File
A herd of elk graze in the meadows of Yellowstone National Park with the background Mt. Holmes, left, and Mt. Dome, Aug. 15, 1997, in Wyoming.

Wapiti. Elk. North American red deer. Whatever you choose to call them, their shrieks biting through the forest or tearing across the plains can sound worryingly like the other-worldly wails of a Ringwraith, ripped straight from the pages of the Lord of the Rings.

The similarity between those bone-chilling voices and the cries of the wapiti has long perplexed scientists, curious as to how such a big animal could produce such a high-pitched sound, but new research published Wednesday in the Journal of Experimental Biology throws some light on the paradox.

It turns out the wapiti does indeed utter the low roar one would expect from a creature of its stature, but that deep rumble is usually overshadowed by the other sound it makes, a bugle sound likely produced using a separate mechanism.

“One key element encoded in vocal information is about size – bigger animals tend to have lower frequency vocalizations, while smaller ones have higher,” says lead author David Reby of the University of Sussex, UK, in a telephone interview. “If you look at most large deer, they follow that rule. In the case of wapiti, their vocalization pitch is what you would expect from very tiny animals.”

The phenomenon has been studied before, but a satisfactory explanation had so far eluded scientists. This latest effort was prompted by postdoctoral fellow Megan Wyman’s trip to New Zealand, where she made some high-quality recordings of the calls in question.

Previous work had focused on the wapiti’s larynx – the voice box – and had assessed that it was capable of producing bellows as high as 1,000 Hz in pitch. But the wails from the wapiti reach far higher, up to 4,000 Hz.

Through the analysis of spectrograms – tools that produce visual representations of sounds – the researchers were able to establish that two separate sounds were being made.

“They use a low-frequency roar, but also a whistle,” explains Dr. Reby. “The fact they’re doing both simultaneously is quite unique. There are some similar cases, but usually one of the sounds lies in the ultrasonic range.”

Fortune smiled on the team, when a colleague at France's Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle made contact to say that a male wapiti from that institution had passed away, offering Reby the chance to take a closer look at the mechanisms involved.

While the work was still inconclusive as to how the higher calls are actually produced – though they did come away with two theories – the scientists have some shrewd guesses as to their purpose.

One possibility is that the whistles communicate information about an individual’s size, with a bigger lung capacity providing the ability to make higher-pitched whistles.

But Reby suggests that the most likely explanation lies in the long distance these wails can travel – helpful in the hunt for a mate.

“People will tell you they hear the bugle calls many miles away, whereas they don’t hear the low roar,” says the professor. “Thus the animals can be detected by potential partners far away.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Scientists investigate deer that sounds just like a Nazgûl
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today