Sending robots to Alpha Centauri? Stephen Hawking is on it.

A new program backed by Yuri Milner, Stephen Hawking, and Mark Zuckerberg aims to shoot gram-sized craft to Alpha Centauri using laser beam propulsion.

Lucas Jackson/Reuters
Physicist Stephen Hawking sits in front of investor Yuri Milner (l.), physicist Freeman Dyson (c.), and physicist Avi Loeb on stage during an announcement of the Breakthrough Starshot initiative in New York on Tuesday.

A new research initiative could provide the building blocks for a program that would send robots trillions of miles into space to better understand our neighboring star system.

Billionaire investor Yuri Milner announced the Breakthrough Starshot project, the latest in Mr. Milner’s Breakthrough Initiatives started in 2015.

Breakthrough Starshot aims to send data-seeking nanocraft to Alpha Centauri, the nearest star system to the solar system, using laser propulsion. While the Breakthrough board of Milner, physicist Stephen Hawking, and entrepreneur Mark Zuckerberg just announced Starshot on Tuesday, they say it may not launch for 20 years, conservatively – and wouldn't reach Alpha Centauri for another 20 after that, despite traveling at one-fifth the speed of light.

"We came to the conclusion it can be done: interstellar travel," Milner told The New York Times. He added that he hopes medicine would advance enough through the years of Starshot's development to allow him to live to see its launch.

"The human story is one of great leaps," he said in a Breakthrough release. "Fifty-five years ago today, Yuri Gagarin became the first human in space. Today, we are preparing for the next great leap – to the stars."

Prior to Starshot, Milner backed the Breakthrough Listen extraterrestrial communication project, launched last year, and the Breakthrough Message program, which aims to send digital messages through deep space.

"It's time to open the era of interstellar flight, but we need to keep our feet on the ground to achieve this," said former NASA Ames Research Center director Pete Worden, who will head the Starshot initiative.

Starshot's research phase will cost around $100 million, not taking into account what the final mission would end up costing – a sum Milner told the Times could reach $10 billion.

Milner and Mr. Worden's end goal for Breakthrough Starshot is to send a mothership containing thousands of gram-scale nanocraft into orbit. There, 100 gigawatt phased laser "light beamers" would push one hundred atom-thick "lightsails" attached to the nanocraft to propel them to the stars where their cameras would send data back to Earth.

It sounds like science fiction and the team behind Starshot knows how tough it could be to eventually pull off, although they believe the technology needed to complete the mission is either currently available or will be in the near future. Concerns include the actual feasibility of the project and the durability of the tiny craft over 20 years of perilous space travel, among others, and Breakthrough has opened its list of potential challenges to public comment.

"The problems remaining to be solved – any one of them are showstoppers,” Worden told Reuters.

Travel to Alpha Centauri 4.37 light years (25.6 trillion miles) away would take today's spacecraft 30,000 years to complete, according to Breakthrough. With the light beaming technology, though, nanocraft could end up at the star system within two decades, allowing for an up-close look at a part of the universe humans may never reach.

"Earth is a wonderful place, but it might not last forever," Mr. Hawking said. "Sooner or later, we must look to the stars. Breakthrough Starshot is a very exciting first step on that journey."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Sending robots to Alpha Centauri? Stephen Hawking is on it.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today